Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Popman

And, if you amend the Constitution you will have changed what SCOTUS must test against.

An Amendment to create term limits then would be the foundational law of the land. How can SCOTUS find unconstitutional what the people define as constitutional? Seems to me that would be a fuse on a powder keg.

It’s time to take back the country.


19 posted on 12/12/2009 8:52:08 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: PubliusMM

California has has term limits, and has had them since the 1990s. I can’t think of a more powerful argument against term limits than that fact.


21 posted on 12/12/2009 8:54:45 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: PubliusMM
And, if you amend the Constitution you will have changed what SCOTUS must test against.

Amending the Constitution to place term limits as law of the land would take at least 12 years and even if 2/3 of the states actually pass legislation to make Congress vote on it, do you really think Congress will pass an amendment forcing themselves out of a job?

A invigorated and educated people are the answer to reign these DC clowns in by making an educated vote.

I'm afraid we are too late to turn the country around.

CWII will probably be the final answer to cleanse this land of the vermin currently running it

25 posted on 12/12/2009 9:13:35 AM PST by Popman (Election 2010: Congress, your pink slips are coming ...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson