One story in a Seattle TV webpage stated that Clemmons was in posession of one of the officer’s weapons when he was killed. There has been nothing that I could find that states that Clemmons was in posession of a handgun other than an officers’s firearm. I conclude that Clemmons grabbed a weapon from an officer at the table. It explains how one cop had time to return fire
If Clemmons had in his posession a firearm, the news media would be full of commentary about the need for new gun restrictions.
He showed two men and his half brother two handguns the night before the execution. This was a well planned murder. The Tacoma paper had a very good timeline of Mr. Clemmons. It explains a lot other people don’t want to hear.
DK