Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
"And Browner is now leading the "science is settled" stonewalling in the wake of Climategate. "I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists," she said. "These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real."

" In any case, last year, more than 31,000 scientists -- including 9,021 Ph.D.s -- signed a petition sponsored by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine rejecting claims of human-caused global warming."

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Full disclosure: I am one of those 31,000 scientists.

Further disclosure: A significant number of that IPCC group of "2500 scientists" have asked to have their names removed from that list. But the IPCC insisted on keeping their names on the list -- despite their protests. The actual number of scientists supporting IPCC conclusions is significantly less than 2500.

IOW, that "2500" number is, itself a lie.

8 posted on 12/02/2009 5:47:42 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ETL

ping to post #8


14 posted on 12/02/2009 9:19:22 PM PST by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TXnMA

“Full disclosure: I am one of those 31,000 scientists.”

Thank you for your bravery for standing up for THE TRUTH. It is refreshing to see an actual scientist stand up for the integrity of his/her profession. I hope it in no way affects your livelihood, as it has some!


24 posted on 12/03/2009 5:18:34 AM PST by GWMcClintock ("When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?" Ps.11:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TXnMA; All

” Further disclosure: A significant number of that IPCC group of “2500 scientists” have asked to have their names removed from that list. But the IPCC insisted on keeping their names on the list — despite their protests. The actual number of scientists supporting IPCC conclusions is significantly less than 2500.

IOW, that “2500” number is, itself a lie. “

Many of these people should be arrested for fraud, malfeasance, and misappropriation of federal and state funds.


30 posted on 12/03/2009 5:34:30 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TXnMA; NoObamaFightForConservatives

You will be one of those written in history as being on the right side. The others are nothing but hacks who don’t deserve the label of ‘scientist’. Con artists all. They are hurting the cause of Science and making a mockery of it.


37 posted on 12/03/2009 8:10:06 AM PST by 444Flyer (You're either with us and our falsely accused Navy Seals, or you're with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TXnMA

[[Further disclosure: A significant number of that IPCC group of “2500 scientists” have asked to have their names removed from that list.]]

Further disclosure- many of those who left the IPCC have testified in written statements, that they were FORCED to sign statements that claimed man is to blame despite the FACT that they did NOT beleive it themselves- they have testified in writing, that they were pressured, coerced, and bullied, yet congress compeltely ignored these many sceintists instead of investigating hteir claims. Since so much potential money was riding on any mandates that might have coem from the ‘sceince’. our congress was OBLIGATED to make absolutely sure man was involved, yet they chose NOT to listen to htose who tried to sound hte alarm that man is NOTY responsible- making congress complicit in the fraud- Let’s hope inhofe calls for prosecution of ANYONE involved in this massive massive cover-up- Inhofe himself has reams of evidence and testimonies from former IPCC scientists who have testified to hte fact that they were pressured agaisnt hteir iwll to sign onto ‘man-caused’ global warming- hopefully he will say “I have been tryign for years now to get you folks in congress to take your job seriously, and to uphold your duty by investigating these coutner claims, and you have refused, so apparently the only thign left to do is to prosecute anyone who was invovled in this cover-up’


41 posted on 12/03/2009 10:21:10 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson