Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: milwguy

Here’s my prediction of how htis is goign to play out- The CRU folks are goign to play innocent (those not invovled in the emails and chart fudging) and they are goign to hang those in the emails out to dry, and stand before the world and say something like “You can’t convict the whole climate control science movement based on the actions of a ‘Few Rogue Employees”, and they will clai mthat their is still a vast amount of research which supports the idea that man is to blame, and that we can’t villify the whole movement over a ‘scant few rogues’ when the ‘vast majority of ethical scientists’ still think man is to blame

You watch— they will throw their wounded to the wolves, and go on as if nothing untoward in the ‘vast majority’ of the ranks was ever goign on.

What we need is for more insider damning info from even more members of CRU and the IPCC to really solidify our case against them all- Just like ACORN, who claimed they were mostly innocent, and claimed we couldn;’t condemn the hwole movement based on a few bad apples- the issue was losing steam until new reports started emerging about how more acorn offices tried to bury incriminating facts but got caught in the process- now, people are really startign to take notice, and the movement’s credibility is really beginning to suffer irreversible damage-

Hopefully more and more incriminating evidence will come out against CRU and the IPCC showing the corruption to be widespread, otherwise, they are goign to feign innocence, claim they were duped by rogue employees, blindsided, and claim they knew nothign about it, and hte issue will quietly fade away, or at least amount to nothing more than a fleshwound from which they will recover, and govenrments will still continue using the ‘legit info’ to make their case that wer’e all a bunch of carbon craving evil gargoyles hell bent on earth’s destruction


81 posted on 11/23/2009 11:09:37 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

Ah yes..the ACORN defense...

One word....RICO.


83 posted on 11/23/2009 11:19:59 PM PST by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: CottShop

You watch— they will throw their wounded to the wolves,
++++++++++++++++

That must be the ‘green’ way of saying throw them under the bus!
************************

“Hopefully more and more incriminating evidence will come out against CRU and the IPCC showing the corruption to be widespread, otherwise, they are goign to feign innocence, claim they were duped by rogue employees, blindsided, and claim they knew nothign about it, and hte issue will quietly fade away, or at least amount to nothing more than a fleshwound from which they will recover,”
++++++++++++++

While I agree with you that we may need more - look over post 80 and just see the massive lengths they went to to manipulate.

How can any government body trust these wackos work again?


92 posted on 11/24/2009 7:08:18 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson