To: FromLori
I am hearing repeated anecdotes from multiple areas that foreclosed property held by banks with multiple full-price offers that include a financing requirement are being sold instead to people with actual cash at radical reductions from that price. This implies that these financing contingencies are regarded as not only potentially no good but factually no good, as if the banks know for a fact that the credit pipeline will (not might), within weeks or months (in the time required to close), disappear. There is no other rational explanation for this behavior.
I would interpret this differently. This looks like the banks are desparate for cash NOW, rather than a moneymaking stream of cash flows (as they may not be in business to benefit from a long-term mortgage).....
hh
6 posted on
10/23/2009 12:59:23 PM PDT by
hoosier hick
(Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
To: hoosier hick
Most of the banks that I am talking to are holding onto their foreclosed properties...not selling them...not financing them...nothing.
8 posted on
10/23/2009 1:03:31 PM PDT by
demsux
To: hoosier hick
I kind of agree that is why they are doing it but then the effect is the same no matter the reason.
20 posted on
10/23/2009 1:20:25 PM PDT by
FromLori
(FromLori)
To: hoosier hick
Isn’t that where the problem lies? We are told banks are siting on Billions of dollars cash, just not lending it.
So what happened to all those Billions?
25 posted on
10/23/2009 1:41:19 PM PDT by
Freddd
(CNN is not credible.)
To: hoosier hick; FromLori
I am hearing repeated anecdotes from multiple areas that foreclosed property held by banks with multiple full-price offers that include a financing requirement are being sold instead to people with actual cash at radical reductions from that price. This implies that these financing contingencies are regarded as not only potentially no good but factually no good, as if the banks know for a fact that the credit pipeline will (not might), within weeks or months (in the time required to close), disappear. There is no other rational explanation for this behavior. I would interpret this differently. This looks like the banks are desparate for cash NOW, rather than a moneymaking stream of cash flows (as they may not be in business to benefit from a long-term mortgage).....
If Bank A holds a property and gets multiple full-priced offers that are to be financed by Banks B or C, then it should not care about future income stream. At closing, Bank A would be paid in full. This is telling me that Bank A is not even confident that the buyer will be able to close. This is about taking cash today vs taking a promise of cash in 30 days or so.
37 posted on
10/23/2009 4:31:41 PM PDT by
Cooter
To: hoosier hick
with enough cash the banks can repay their tarp money. and the exec’s can get their bonuses
54 posted on
10/24/2009 9:45:31 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson