The press release is deliberately misleading. It gives the false impression that the California Science Center is hosting this event.
When in fact the Freedom Alliance has rented this room just like anybody can for a wedding reception, or a private party, that is the very reason for that clause in the contract.
And now you can read motives from afar?
You say misleading so I suppose you actually read the press release in the link you provided.
It says “premiere” It was the first public showing.
It says at the California Science Center, check.
It says in the IMAX theater, check.
The Center is an “affiliate of the Smithsonian”, yes.
So what is misleading, what words can you point to to support your accusation or is that like “false witness” when you cannot (or will not)?