[alstewartfan]

Filo, that’s the problem. The only dissent allowed comes from “WITHIN” Darwinist thinking. Anyone outside the box must be destroyed. Real intellectual thought going on! Darwinists, frankly, are “small and fearful men” (and women). Bob

[Filo]

Filo, that’s the problem. The only dissent allowed comes from “WITHIN” Darwinist thinking.

Not at all. There is no problem with allowing only scientific evidence and thought and with ignoring the prattling of the uneducated.

There is absolutely no reason to allow for abject stupidity in science (unless that's what you're studying.) If that weren't the case we could then start reconsidering the geocentric nature of the universe, flat Earth theories and other nonsense.

[tpanther]

Filo, that’s the problem. The only dissent allowed comes from “WITHIN” Darwinist thinking. Anyone outside the box must be destroyed. Real intellectual thought going on! Darwinists, frankly, are “small and fearful men” (and women). Bob

Precisely...I've submitted the question if a peer review article or work was submitted and no one attached their name to it, how would scientists detemine if the work was submitted by an evolutionist or a creationist?

So far no takers...

only crickets.

If evolution "science" were as strong as evos claim it is, they wouldn't need to rely on judges and courts.