The same "scientists" that bring us Global Warming doom theories and Second Hand Smoke doom theories are the same idiots who profess that Intelligent Design is NOT SCIENCE!
Well if the Global Warming hysteria and Second Hand Smoke hysteria is based on "Science", then maybe Intelligent design proponents should be glad that these idiots are not putting their theories in the same category as the frauds that the Global Warming quacks are perpetuating.
I don't see you guys complaining that Global Warming theories and second hand smoke theories are NOT SCIENCE. Those guys all get published in peer review articles and they get praised by evolutionists and other secular scientists for the BS that they publish, yet they scoff at anyone who suggests that life forms on this planet cannot be explained based on current natural laws and that they may therefore be the result of some supernatural intervention [which is kind of an obvious conclusion].
Do you think anyone will notice that the scientists who don't believe in the Global Warming and Second Hand Smoke "doom theories" got left out of that assesment?
WTF??? You can't support that statement. Intelligent Design (i.e.; Theistic Evolution) is widely supported in the scientific community. I even know some in the scientific and academic community who support strict environmental policy because of the biblical mandates to be good stewards of the earth.
Well if the Global Warming hysteria and Second Hand Smoke hysteria is based on "Science", then maybe Intelligent design proponents should be glad that these idiots are not putting their theories in the same category as the frauds that the Global Warming quacks are perpetuating.
I don't see you guys complaining that Global Warming theories and second hand smoke theories are NOT SCIENCE. Those guys all get published in peer review articles and they get praised by evolutionists and other secular scientists for the BS that they publish, yet they scoff at anyone who suggests that life forms on this planet cannot be explained based on current natural laws and that they may therefore be the result of some supernatural intervention [which is kind of an obvious conclusion].
Great points P-Marlowe, thanks!