To: GourmetDan
Nope. The 'scientific process' is a logical fallacy by definition. It assumes naturalism and then defines all observation in terms of naturalism, this is a logical fallacy. Well, I gotta give you credit. Unlike the others, while you have no use for science you at least have the stones to admit it. Other luddites like GGG dishonestly pretend to support "true" science, though nothing could be further from the truth.
46 posted on
09/25/2009 9:56:44 AM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: Alter Kaker
"Well, I gotta give you credit. Unlike the others, while you have no use for science you at least have the stones to admit it. Other luddites like GGG dishonestly pretend to support "true" science, though nothing could be further from the truth." Unfortunately, I can't give you any credit for using the fallacy of begging the question as argument.
58 posted on
09/25/2009 10:38:07 AM PDT by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson