Posted on 08/21/2009 6:02:32 AM PDT by WhiteCastle
NHS Worcestershire ruled that Judith Roe, 74, did not qualify for NHS funding because her condition was a "social" rather than "health" problem, even though she was so ill she could not make a cup of tea and regularly left the stove on.
She was forced to sell her £200,000 home to pay her £600-a-week nursing home fees, which would have been funded if she had been categorised correctly. Her son, Richard, 40, urged other families in a similar situation to fight for the care they are entitled to.
He said: "The way the health trust behaved was scandalous. It has been very stressful.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
I would say irreversible degeneration of cognitive function is a HEALTH not a social problem.
Baroness Warnock: Dementia sufferers may have a 'duty to die'
A preview of coming attractions...
Paging the folks who are still with AARP: Can't say you weren't warned.
NICE examines stroke, dementia and VTE
From the link....
Alongside stroke, dementia and VTE, quality standards will also be initially developed for neonatal care. The first quality standards are expected to be available early next year, NICE said.
Which puts me in mind of this article...
John Donne
If she's in a nursing home, what does she need the house for, whatever its price?
And losing a limb is an "inconvenience."
Socialized Health Care (obamacare) headed your way my friends.
She might have wanted to hang on to it because the NHS doesn’t cover all of the costs associated with Alzheimers care. And/or maybe her kids/grandkids wanted her to leave the house to them. Maybe that’s what she wanted also.
It appears the NHS isn’t covering any of the costs associated with Alzheimer’s Care.
“I would say irreversible degeneration of cognitive function is a HEALTH not a social problem.”
It certainly is a health problem. It is an organic process, which does not have its origins in behavior but the body’s malfunctioning cells.
Here's Heritage on the same story...
She was forced to sell her £200,000 home to pay her £600-a-week nursing home fees, which would have been funded if she had been categorised correctly.
While I must agree,El Rushbo summed up the most insidious aspect of how each of us would be regarded(by the government)under single-payer,government run healthcare.We would each become a”budget item”!
Healthcare trusts 'not paying for Nice approved drugs'
Four in 10 local healthcare trusts are not funding medications which have been approved by the Government’s drugs rationing body, a new survey shows.
What a charlie foxtrot...
And yet unlike other “budget items” with a built in constituency and the prospect of growing every year out into eternity; your health care will be a “budget item” with a constituency of one that they will be eager to cut.
If she's in a nursing home, what does she need the house for, whatever its price?
The kids want the house, but the state to pay for her care. They couldn't be bothered to care for her. Before Social Security, caring families took in their parents in their later years. They did the caring. They got the estate which they deserved. Now with socialism, the elderly are a burden. Socialism amounts to breaking the bonds of love.
Excellent observation.
It just struck me as a funny sentence: they’d originally specified that she was incompetent to live alone, but implied that the sale of her house was a hardship to a nursing home occupant.
I think people should pay for their own medical care, or their own insurance to cover it, too.
That was my interpretation, too. Not a very charitable judgment of the motives, of course ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.