I believe the operative word is significant.
Do you find .7 Deg. C. in the past century significant?
I sure don’t.
Check out “Heaven and Earth” by Ian Plimer, just out.
It makes for one heck of a read.
It makes the mere thought of AGW seem absolutely silly.
You got some learnin’ to do.
I’m simply pointing out that the article is internally inconsistent. You have to pick a point of view and stick with it or your message gets fuzzy, just like the left-wingers.
And your .7 degrees is not accurate. The data are still being re-reviewed with the knowledge that it’s been consistently skewed since 2000 or so. Also 80% of the temperature recording stations don’t meet the NOAA guidelines for temperature recording stations and should be considered invalid.
How’s that?