Skip to comments.
Full Text of the House Dem "Advanced Care Planning" end-of-life consultation
JEFFHEAD.COM ^
| August 9, 2009
| Jeff Head
Posted on 08/09/2009 10:35:59 AM PDT by Jeff Head
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
1
posted on
08/09/2009 10:36:00 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
To: Noumenon; joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; ...
2
posted on
08/09/2009 10:37:44 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: All
3
posted on
08/09/2009 10:40:07 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Jeff Head
Try as I might, I can't seem to find anything about a “death panel”. A majority of medical costs occur in the last stages of life, and unfortunately most people don't plan ahead (living wills, heath care directives, DNRs, etc). I don't see anything wrong with folks developing a strategy to ease the transition for themselves and their families.
4
posted on
08/09/2009 10:44:41 AM PDT
by
stormer
To: Jeff Head
What does it mean, "stake holders"? And what in HELL is the
bar association showing up as one got to do with anything?
BTW----------Where in the HELL is tort reform withing the 1000 plus pages of this tome from the depths of hell?
5
posted on
08/09/2009 10:49:00 AM PDT
by
Republic
To: stormer
Do you mean the actual WORDING of ‘death panel’? OF COURSE those words are not in the plan....the death panel refers to the statistics that will be set that determine who has a nice enough quality of life, determined again, by the death mongers, to earn a few more years of life using equipment needed to support that life. IE...are those dependent on that expensive ozygen contributing members to society, etc.
6
posted on
08/09/2009 10:51:06 AM PDT
by
Republic
To: Jeff Head
(5)(A) For purposes of this section, the term
order regarding life sustaining treatment means, with respect to an individual, an ACTIONABLE medical order relating to the treatment of that individual Explain Actionable
7
posted on
08/09/2009 10:52:42 AM PDT
by
Little Bill
(Carol Che-Porter is a MOONBAT.)
To: Jeff Head
if, subject to paragraph (3), the individual involved has not had such a consultation within the last 5 years. Such consultation shall include the following:Sounds peremptory to me.
To: Jeff Head
"orders for life sustaining treatments"In case anyone is in doubt as to the meaning of this phrase--it is an Orwellian bureaucratic device to refer to orders ending life, not sustaining it. Things like "no heroic measures," "palliative (comfort) care only" and the alltime fave, "Do Not Resuscitate."
To: stormer
Oreders for life sustaining treatment:
is guided by a coalition of stakeholders includes representatives from emergenc medical services, emergency department physicians or nurses, state long-term care association, state medical association, state surveyors, agency responsible for senior services, state department of health, state hospital association, home health association, state bar association, and state hospice association
There is no problem with people doing this for themselves, with their Doctor, you know, the one they chose, and their familites...it's when statists and others want to interject government and their "complete lives" calculations and government bureaucrats and "stake holders" that is the issue.
With me and most people I know.
Here's a clue. If you want top consult with the government on your end of life issues...knock yourself out. But don't try and force it on me and mine or most folks I know.
My mother has severe diminsia. She's 84 years old and we take care of her and get her the treatment she needs. Ezekiel believes such people should not get any treatment.
We have done this for five years and my mother has interacted with her great grandkids...and they with her. Government will not deprive me of that experience as long as I draw breath. God may...and I have faith in Him and His timing and control of such matters. But not the governemtn.
10
posted on
08/09/2009 10:57:29 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Republic
11
posted on
08/09/2009 10:57:49 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Jeff Head
As God is my witness; when Obama-Care leaves me for dead I swear I will take as many of these bastards with me as I can! I mean, what the hell are they going to do about it
kill me?
12
posted on
08/09/2009 10:58:36 AM PDT
by
ArchAngel1983
(Arch Angel- on guard)
To: hinckley buzzard
13
posted on
08/09/2009 11:00:59 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Jeff Head; stormer
Obama/Dems are masters at double speak, remember it all depends on what the definition of “is” is.
14
posted on
08/09/2009 11:01:26 AM PDT
by
mel
To: Jeff Head
15
posted on
08/09/2009 11:05:02 AM PDT
by
Turret Gunner A20
(There is not enough combined intellect in the beltway to jumpstart a moron.)
To: stormer
You expected to see the term 'death panel' used by the statists? How disingenuous. You would argue that these 'consultations' do not (or will not, very shortly) evolve into
de facto death panels? How utterly naive. Goobermint has never -- never means
not once -- acquired any power that it has not, typically sooner than later, abused. And so here. And so, already, in the UK. Read up on their vaunted 'National Plan', boyo.
Nothing wrong with folks developing a strategy to 'ease the transition'...VOLUNTARILY, on their own hook. EVERYTHING is wrong when goobermint gets involved with 'developing' such 'strategies'.
16
posted on
08/09/2009 11:05:03 AM PDT
by
SAJ
To: ArchAngel1983
I' afraid if they ever get this implemented (God forbid), then in a few years when it is entrenched and they start trying to pull this end-of-life bravo sierra on Korean and Vietnam War vets...you see a lot of the "two-fer" and "take some with you" thoughts coming into play.
But I intend to do all in my power to never let it get that far.
Defeat it now...spread the word to all you know. Put the fear of God and the voters into these reps now so they fear their own constituents more than they fear Pelosi or Obama and it goes down.
Or, failing that, neuter the quislings in 2010 and turn it back thereafter, and particularly after we run the ringer out of the Whitehouse in 2012.
17
posted on
08/09/2009 11:06:20 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: stormer
--------(iii) A program for orders for life sustaining treatment for a States described in this clause is a program that ...(IV) is guided by a coalition of stakeholders includes representatives from emergenc medical services, emergency department physicians or nurses, state long-term care association, state medical association, state surveyors, agency responsible for senior services, state department of health, state hospital association, home health association, state bar association, and state hospice association. The death panel will have a benign title, something like "Advanced Care Planning Healthcare Coalition." You have to realize, bills are written to deliberately obscure as much as they delineate and define. That's how they get people to go along with the music without reading the words.
To: Republic
19
posted on
08/09/2009 11:07:21 AM PDT
by
stormer
To: Jeff Head
In my view, the most piercing question to put to a baby boomer is "why do you think this section exists at all?"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson