“Is it because he was not born there? Or because there is something else embarassing on it?” What a disgustingly liberal thing to try and float at FR ... you would allow this affirmative action liar set the Constitution aside on his word that something ‘embarrassing’ is contained on the actual documents of his birth, and disregard the document fraud of him posting a ficticious CoLB to demand you leave him alone.
I defy you to find where I said any such thing. I think you have become unhinged. I have said since this issue first arose, sometime in the spring of 2008, that he should be required to show his birth certificate. I suspect that the reason that he does not is not that he wasn't born there, but there is something else on it that he doesn't want revealed. That's his motive, I have never said it was a valid excuse.
You have serious issues.