Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israeli navy in Suez Canal prepares for potential attack on Iran
TIMESONLINE ^ | July 16, 2009

Posted on 07/15/2009 7:18:13 PM PDT by metmom

Two Israeli missile class warships have sailed through the Suez Canal ten days after a submarine capable of launching a nuclear missile strike, in preparation for a possible attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

The deployment into the Red Sea, confirmed by Israeli officials, was a clear signal that Israel was able to put its strike force within range of Iran at short notice. It came before long-range exercises by the Israeli air force in America later this month and the test of a missile defence shield at a US missile range in the Pacific Ocean.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bho44; democrats; iran; iranwar; israel; nukes; obama; tm; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last
To: shield

Perhaps this - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2293107/posts


41 posted on 07/15/2009 8:05:04 PM PDT by califamily4W (Freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: metmom
get some.
42 posted on 07/15/2009 8:07:17 PM PDT by glock rocks (... just tryin to make do ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screenombre

The rest of us can tell the difference between an ally (Israel) and an enemy pointing a nuclear bomb at us (Iran).

I also support America having nuclear weapons while opposing Iran and Nort Korea having them. Duh.


43 posted on 07/15/2009 8:07:41 PM PDT by Williams (It's The Policies, Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Ya better keep em topped off all the time.
______________________________

You got it. I never let mine go below 3/4.


44 posted on 07/15/2009 8:07:51 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: califamily4W; ladyjane
No...here it is.

Israel has decided to go ahead. Taking into account political, geopolitical, military preparedness, and climatic conditions, there are two windows: between July 21 and 24 and between August 6 and 8. Advance teams comprised of Mossad agents and military personnel are already on the ground in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Iraq (including in the Kurdish lands, adjacent to Turkey).

http://www.globalpolitician.com/25720-iran-israel-nuclear-obama-usa

45 posted on 07/15/2009 8:09:44 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r


46 posted on 07/15/2009 8:09:44 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

We sleep soundly in our beds because hard men stand ready to do violence on our behalf...there is nothing we can ever do to repay them...thank the God that made them....they are the best of us.
__________________________________

Amen to that. God bless them.


47 posted on 07/15/2009 8:09:48 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All


48 posted on 07/15/2009 8:12:24 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: screenombre

If Israel gave up all it’s weapons tomorrow, there would be another Holocaust.

If the Arabs gave up all their weapons tomorrow, there would be Peace.

Simple.


50 posted on 07/15/2009 8:14:09 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: screenombre

“Can you explain why Israel can have nukes and Iran can’t? I realize that Israel didn’t get them on their own (your money) but in terms of “sovereignty of a nation” explain why one sovereign nation can have them and why one can’t and then explain how you would deal with China on the issue. Thanks for your help.”

Well one example might be looking at 2 subsets of Americans who are age 24 for example. One group might be highly trained Navy pilots; the other group is in prison.

One group can be given much more responsibility than the other group.


51 posted on 07/15/2009 8:22:45 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (I agree with Rick..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: HereInTheHeartland

I still can’t believe this guy! I think he is a little confused about where he is right now. Anti-Semite stuff won’t fly here. We here at FR love the America our Founding Fathers gave us and love the Israel God gave the Jews. Enough said.


53 posted on 07/15/2009 8:27:29 PM PDT by camerongood210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: screenombre

Iran gives state-sponsored aid to train suicide bombers. Mutually Assured Destruction doesn’t work on people with a suicide bomber’s mentality. That’s why Iran can’t have nukes.


54 posted on 07/15/2009 8:29:34 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: screenombre
Noobie, are you seriously arguing as to why Israel has nukes and yet Iran can't??

You aren't going to get a lot of people backing you over here. Maybe you should give DU a try ... you'll find some like-minds to your point of view.

Oh, and welcome to Free Republic.

55 posted on 07/15/2009 8:30:40 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Are we not men? No we are Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Not quite on their own...Recall the Saudis have said they would be more than happy to turn a blind eye to any IDF planes overflying their airspace on their way to Iran, and of course Egypt as mentioned in the article.


56 posted on 07/15/2009 8:32:15 PM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Lock and load


57 posted on 07/15/2009 8:33:57 PM PDT by Hammer Tym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

Very well put!


58 posted on 07/15/2009 8:36:01 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Are we not men? No ... we are Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: screenombre

It would not be acceptable if China nuked us in a preemptive strike for two reasons:

1. We have absolutely no intention and no likelihood of attacking China and China therefore has zero justification for such an attack and

2. In such an attack, unlike you I realize China would be killing me, my family, my neighbors, my country. Unlike you moral relativists I actually understand the significance of someone murdering me and my loved ones.

3. Because life isn’t fair, I also understand that China may launch such an attack, not because it’s “fair” or “OK” but because they are murdering, Godless communist dictators.


59 posted on 07/15/2009 8:36:07 PM PDT by Williams (It's The Policies, Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: shield

“there are two windows: between July 21 and 24 and between August 6 and 8”

I didn’t see an explanation in the article. Any ideas?


60 posted on 07/15/2009 8:36:09 PM PDT by camerongood210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson