Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(California) Madam Speaker Bashes Republicans as Terrorists
LA Times ^ | 27th Jun '09 | PATT MORRISON

Posted on 06/28/2009 12:48:11 AM PDT by blueplum

interview exerpt:

QUESTION: How do you think conservative talk radio has affected the Legislature's work?

BASS: "The Republicans were essentially threatened and terrorized against voting for revenue. Now [some] are facing recalls. They operate under a terrorist threat: "You vote for revenue and your career is over." I don't know why we allow that kind of terrorism to exist. I guess it's about free speech, but it's extremely unfair."

QUESTION: Do you get especially exasperated when your own people -- Democrats -- don't agree with you?

You know, I was a community activist, so I'm used to standing out in front of an elected official's office and protesting. It's only been five years since I've been on the other side. I get frustrated when we're in the middle of the deepest recession since the Depression and people say, "You really shouldn't cut." This is very, very painful. I'm doing the exact opposite of what I ran for office for. But I do have to be an adult in this situation. My job is to protect [programs]....

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bass; california; karenbass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Republicans are "terrorists" and community activists "protect" hmmm? interesting message there
1 posted on 06/28/2009 12:48:11 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Since California added term limits to the political rule book in 1990, the piece of furniture occupied by the speaker of the California Assembly has become both a musical chair and an ejector seat. We've had nine speakers in 14 years. Karen Bass is the latest, a Los Angeles Democrat and the first black woman in the job. She was elected to the Assembly in 2004. She became speaker a year ago, and she'll have to pack up and be gone next year. When I first met her, she was a physician's assistant and a community organizer, crusading for foster care and against the myriad liquor stores in South Los Angeles. Sure, today she sits next to the governor in the "big five" meetings -- but with the ticking clock of term limits and the most hellacious budget in decades, I think of the speaker's job now as much like the Woody Allen joke about two women chatting at a resort: "The food here is so awful." "Yes, and such small portions." Bass dishes it out, and takes it.
2 posted on 06/28/2009 12:54:02 AM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

That an ignorant Dem considers the exercise of Democracy terrorism is hardly news.


3 posted on 06/28/2009 12:58:38 AM PDT by NoLibZone (North Korea? The only buildings in Hawaii at risk of destruction are those housing ObamaÂ’s records!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Just so you know what it is:

And also note she was a..... drum roll please.....
community activist!
4 posted on 06/28/2009 1:04:41 AM PDT by NoLibZone (North Korea? The only buildings in Hawaii at risk of destruction are those housing ObamaÂ’s records!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

I wonder if Zero intends to imprison republicans indefinitely for being terrorists?


5 posted on 06/28/2009 1:14:56 AM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
"The Republicans were essentially threatened and terrorized against voting for revenue. Now [some] are facing recalls. They operate under a terrorist threat: "You vote for revenue and your career is over." I don't know why we allow that kind of terrorism to exist. I guess it's about free speech, but it's extremely unfair."

As opposed to the fair and equitable treatment of Joe Lieberman by the Democrats.

6 posted on 06/28/2009 1:16:33 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("I'm sure this goes against everything you've been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

well, exercise of Democracy by Republicans anyway ;)

I have to say I’ve looked at Dems as a group as complete dingbats, but I’ve never considered my fellow citizens ‘terrorists’. How Rude! Crude! and Socially Unacceptable!

Were it not for Napolitano’s redacted (but still out there propaganda wise) ‘terrorist’ report, and Iran’s mullahs categorizing their own protestors as ‘terrorists’ maybe it would just have gone over my head and I wouldn’t have noticed the comment at all, but it makes me wonder....what’s going on!?


7 posted on 06/28/2009 1:43:41 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

ask her what would happen if she voted against anything pro-homo.

my guess, she would be out. she seems to be operating under a terrorist threat herself... one that desecrates churches and mugs old ladies holding signs


8 posted on 06/28/2009 1:49:49 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

She needs to be sued for defamation of character. This can not stand.


9 posted on 06/28/2009 1:51:02 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
The word TERRORIST is now effectively devoid of useful meaning.

It died a premature death at the hands and lips of democrat party demagogues and ideologues.

TERRORIST now joins other words like GAY, FAIR, EQUAL, ILLEGAL, NIGGARDLY, FETUS and terms like PRO-CHOICE, FAIRNESS DOCTRINE, and TAX REBATE on the fast growing Double-Speak rubble pile.

These are words and terms that have intentionally been so twisted, distorted, misused and inverted by democrats that they now have lost most, or all, of their original meaning and are practically useless in their original context.

10 posted on 06/28/2009 2:23:41 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Obama as President is like hiring a mechanic who never saw a car before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
"You vote for revenue and your career is over."

The use of the word "career" is part of the problem. Politics is not meant to be a source of "this is what I do for a living to support my family and make ends meet". At that point it has become selfish ambition.

The concept of "service" is gone.

11 posted on 06/28/2009 2:23:44 AM PDT by uptoolate (Primaries mean something - Conservative means Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: uptoolate

The two worst decisions in California history. 1. Ronald Reagon pushing for a full time legislature. Prior to this we had a part time group that tended to be from business and farming that could afford to serve. The fact that it did not pay well kept the hippy liberal trash and real estate agents out. 2. Term limits which have allowed hippy liberal trash of low mental standing to get the power necessary to push through union and special interest legislation that is destroying the state.


12 posted on 06/28/2009 2:27:53 AM PDT by Wooly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blueplum; PGalt; imintrouble
"The Republicans were essentially threatened and terrorized against voting for revenue. Now [some] are facing recalls. They operate under a terrorist threat: "You vote for revenue and your career is over." I don't know why we allow that kind of terrorism to exist. I guess it's about free speech, but it's extremely unfair."
Lemme get this straight - California has term limits, and still a legislator can characterize "petition[ing] the government for a redress of grievances" as a "terrorist threat" (comparable to ACORN's bussing in people to openly case your house and neighborhood if Obama fingers you as "greedy") to the "career" of a legislator!

I think the next step after term limits is a minimum age requirement for politicians - say, about 45 years. That way nobody could get into office without having already had a career.

They love to call it "public service," while they actually treat it as a business opportunity.


13 posted on 06/28/2009 2:37:54 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Bass is a former community organizer.


14 posted on 06/28/2009 3:13:12 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

“I wonder if Zero intends to imprison republicans indefinitely for being terrorists?”

You may be closer to the truth than you realize.


15 posted on 06/28/2009 3:21:06 AM PDT by vanilla swirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
In the article she does fairly point out that the budget problem is due in large part to ballot initiatives that voters have voted for.

The politicians are afraid to cut where they can and she makes the point that people want other areas of government cut but, not the ones that affect them.

She also and in my opinion accurately describes the mentality of people who are dependent on government services and that the typical voter doesn't want to pay for service.

I think what she is saying is that most people don't understand the government of California does not produce money out of thin air. They derive their funds from taxation and fees. They have no decision in monetary policy and are dependent on the American Dollar.

With this basic lack of understanding most people say “let the government pay for it”. Never realizing that taxes on property, gas, food, computers, etc are where the government get its money.

That's right, you are paying certain state taxes so essentially you are funding these services. However, when revenue is reduced through tax collection do to a downturn in the economy and a reduction in spending, there necessarily needs to be a reduction in services.

As I said before the government doesn't manufacture money they tax you to acquire it.

As Californians, we should be adults in this process, as Ms. Bass has declared. That means saying to your representatives “Cut services and we accept that you will also cut services we are dependent on”. An adult would come to that logical conclusion.

Finally, it can be reasoned that since we are cutting services, including those directly affecting us, we should absolutely gut many of the other programs while looking for new resources that will deliver resources.

Cut programs that we simply cannot afford. Here I am talking about the marine biology programs, coastal commission, guards for so called state parks, etc. For new sources of revenue we must develop our natural resources such as oil, offshore and land based, natural gas and provide tax incentives that are friendly to business, while reducing the onerous paperwork required to operate in California.

16 posted on 06/28/2009 3:22:03 AM PDT by Vendome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Republicans are "terrorists" and community activists "protect" hmmm? interesting message there

Well you can sure tell where this person's heart is, coveting other peoples money. This race to a 'new world order' seems to have the liberals taking charge and receiving mass applause for the break neck speed in which they are reenacting the 'French' revolution.

17 posted on 06/28/2009 3:37:35 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Bama and Company are reenacting the Pharaoh as told by Moses in Genesis!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

These are words and terms that have intentionally been so twisted, distorted, misused and inverted by democrats that they now have lost most, or all, of their original meaning and are practically useless in their original context.

****************************************

You forgot racist.


18 posted on 06/28/2009 3:38:39 AM PDT by JavaJumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

You vote for revenue and your career is over.” I don’t know why we allow that kind of terrorism to exist. I guess it’s about free speech,

Read vote for revenue in ENGLISH, as TAXERS..
She guesses that it is about free speech?
How about we get a law passed that says pnly people that have actually read the US Constitution can be elected to office? The idiots like this women would not matter..
Oh and lady. George Washington was a terrorist as was Adams, Jefferson etc......


19 posted on 06/28/2009 3:57:39 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
community activist!

Orwell was so right. We have become a nation of bastardized language. We allow the MSM and communist pukes to dominate, define and dictate. Of course the real problem is that "we" also start using the very same language.

"Activist" my ass. She a white hating, anti-Western, anti-Libery POS.

20 posted on 06/28/2009 4:05:26 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson