Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Military (USS John McCain) Set to Intercept North Korean Ship
fox news ^ | Friday, June 19, 2009

Posted on 06/19/2009 8:44:14 AM PDT by maquiladora

The USS John McCain, a navy destroyer, will intercept the ship Kang Nam as soon as it leaves the vicinity off the coast of China, according to a senior U.S. defense official.

The U.S. military is seeking to intercept a flagged North Korean ship suspected of proliferating weapons material in violation of a U.N. Security Council resolution passed last Friday, FOX News has learned.

The USS John McCain, a navy destroyer, will intercept the ship Kang Nam as soon as it leaves the vicinity off the coast of China, according to a senior U.S. defense official.

The ship left a port in North Korea Wednesday and appears to be heading toward Singapore, according to a senior U.S. military source. The vessel, which the military has been tracking since its departure, could be carrying weaponry, missile parts or nuclear materials.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: mccain; missiledefense; nknukes; nkorea; northkorea; ohtheirony; tm; usnavy; ussjohnmccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: maquiladora

Chins got no place to huff and puff. They have been asked repeatedly to reign in this character. All they give is lip service or rip service. They are more afraid of a unified Korea.


121 posted on 06/20/2009 12:13:26 AM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

A bow shot square on the hull will flood the cargo ship and sink it, preventing the North Korean contraband from reaching its destination.


122 posted on 06/20/2009 6:13:19 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

123 posted on 06/20/2009 7:14:17 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Only if it reaches one of our ports.
the plan is to ask the port not to refuel them.
We don’t have permission to board their ships in any event unless they are in US territory is my understanding.


124 posted on 06/20/2009 7:36:13 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Dang. Better find my checkbook.


125 posted on 06/20/2009 7:59:06 AM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Always Independent

[They (China)are more afraid of a unified Korea.]

This is a national security concern of China’s but economically China would probably gain from unification. China is South Korea’s top import-export partner. The rebuilding of the North could be a bonanza for Chinese companies.


126 posted on 06/20/2009 10:20:13 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFerret
I believe a very stern letter will be required.

A stern letter MAY work, but in this instance a more satisfying delivery would be launched over the bow.

127 posted on 06/20/2009 11:12:15 AM PDT by CRBDeuce (here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
I'm very impressed with the background of the McCain's CO

for this operation. 

128 posted on 06/20/2009 11:21:55 AM PDT by Asceticon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Obama will oppose them but not his Iranian buddies who are getting closer to buidling a nuclear bomb.


129 posted on 06/20/2009 11:47:11 AM PDT by Islaminaction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islaminaction

The big concern appears to be NK proliferating its nukes to Iran or Syria for cash as it already has missile technology.

The Kang Nam should be on track to leave Chinese waters off Hainan Island around Sunday night US time, assuming it makes about 12 knots. This is when it might get interesting.


130 posted on 06/20/2009 11:54:31 AM PDT by Asceticon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Could be, but I think the S Koreans would rather reap the benefits. The Chins don’t want a strong Korea and Japan. They are strong now, but could grow even stronger.


131 posted on 06/20/2009 1:33:33 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1; NYC GOP Chick
I wasn't able to get any confirmation on Snopes or another "fact-checker" site that this was the case aboard the USS Jimmuh, so I'll have to put the statement in limbo for a while. I can check with my cousin's boy, who's out in the Fleet right now (he's a sonarman on a tin can) and see if he's ever heard of this.

Pretty sad if it's true, but very appropriate given who the boat (they say "ship" nowadays but I'm old Navy) is named for.

It was always a bad idea to start naming ships for politicians (Carl Vinson comes to mind, and the George H.W. Bush), now they'll never stop naming our most powerful Fleet units for assorted hacks, timeservers, and poltroons, and squabbling in Congress about what gets named for whom. I halfway expect Obama to rename the George H.W. Bush for Slick Willie or Huey Newton, or hell, even Che Guevara.

132 posted on 06/21/2009 2:16:17 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo; FreedomFerret
[FF] I believe a very stern letter will be required.

[BBC] Instead of a stern letter, I prefer a bow shot.

Ah, screw. Just send them a very sincere Mark 19 instead.

133 posted on 06/21/2009 2:22:41 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
Slow Joe warned us about countries testing the O.

If he did, and then they do, then how slow was he?

134 posted on 06/21/2009 2:31:42 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: meandog
The 5" 54's mounted on destroyers built in the 50's had a range out to slightly over 29,000 yards.

How do the newer models mounted in the Arleigh Burke class stack up to that?

Also, are they (or not) based on the Italian OTO design of 30 years ago? Just wondering.

135 posted on 06/21/2009 2:37:39 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: dfwddr; Le Chien Rouge
[Chien Rouge] USS Palin would flash a wink ,then sink

No more calls please, we have a winner !!

Knock it off, RiNO dweebs. You guys post like Letterman.

136 posted on 06/21/2009 2:48:47 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Hm, so THAAD is 22' 7-1/2" long and 13" in diameter. Should be able to sling that from a lot of launcher rails.
137 posted on 06/21/2009 2:56:01 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
The 5" 54's mounted on destroyers built in the 50's had a range out to slightly over 29,000 yards. How do the newer models mounted in the Arleigh Burke class stack up to that? Also, are they (or not) based on the Italian OTO design of 30 years ago? Just wondering.

The Mark 45 gun, I believe, now features an extended range guided munition out to 63 nm. The 76-mm Oto molara gun now has a much faster rate of fire, 120 rpm.

138 posted on 06/22/2009 5:50:02 AM PDT by meandog (Doh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Good points. I read that here when it was commissioned. Don’t know if it’s true. For all I know they refer to all subs by number as a practice, or either number or name.


139 posted on 06/22/2009 5:53:58 AM PDT by ichabod1 (I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet (GOP Poet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: meandog
The Mark 45 gun, I believe, now features an extended range guided munition out to 63 nm. The 76-mm Oto molara gun now has a much faster rate of fire, 120 rpm.

What's the normal range of the Mark 45 without using the guided subcaliber rounds?

NAVORD fooled around with subcaliber rounds in 8" guns during Vietnam; they reportedly got ranges out to 60 nm. I've no idea whether those were guided rounds (like the contemporary Shillelagh used in the Sheridan's 155mm gun/launcher). There were some daydreams back then of doing the same thing for the Iowa class's 16-inchers.

The ROF on the OTO gun sounds outstanding. During WWI, American artillerymen serving "French 75's" tied down their lanyards and managed to achieve about 50-60 rpm. The Germans came to apprehend that someone had invented a fully-automatic 75mm cannon. Old scuttlebutt story told me by my dad.

140 posted on 06/22/2009 11:32:48 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson