Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Full text of Binyamin Netanyahu's Bar Ilan speech
Jerusalem Post ^ | June 14, 2009 | Netanyahu

Posted on 06/14/2009 2:32:16 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

Honored guests, citizens of Israel.

Peace has always been our people's most ardent desire. Our prophets gave the world the vision of peace, we greet one another with wishes of peace, and our prayers conclude with the word peace.

We are gathered this evening in an institution named for two pioneers of peace, Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, and we share in their vision.

Two and half months ago, I took the oath of office as the Prime Minister of Israel. I pledged to establish a national unity government - and I did. I believed and I still believe that unity was essential for us now more than ever as we face three immense challenges - the Iranian threat, the economic crisis, and the advancement of peace.

The Iranian threat looms large before us, as was further demonstrated yesterday. The greatest danger confronting Israel, the Middle East, the entire world and human race, is the nexus between radical Islam and nuclear weapons. I discussed this issue with President Obama during my recent visit to Washington, and I will raise it again in my meetings next week with European leaders. For years, I have been working tirelessly to forge an international alliance to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Confronting a global economic crisis, the government acted swiftly to stabilize Israel's economy. We passed a two year budget in the government - and the Knesset will soon approve it.

And the third challenge, so exceedingly important, is the advancement of peace. I also spoke about this with President Obama, and I fully support the idea of a regional peace that he is leading.

I share the President's desire to bring about a new era of reconciliation in our region. To this end, I met with President Mubarak in Egypt, and King Abdullah in Jordan, to elicit the support of these leaders in expanding the circle of peace in our region.

I turn to all Arab leaders tonight and I say: "Let us meet. Let us speak of peace and let us make peace. I am ready to meet with you at any time. I am willing to go to Damascus, to Riyadh, to Beirut, to any place- including Jerusalem.

I call on the Arab countries to cooperate with the Palestinians and with us to advance an economic peace. An economic peace is not a substitute for a political peace, but an important element to achieving it. Together, we can undertake projects to overcome the scarcities of our region, like water desalination or to maximize its advantages, like developing solar energy, or laying gas and petroleum lines, and transportation links between Asia, Africa and Europe.

The economic success of the Gulf States has impressed us all and it has impressed me. I call on the talented entrepreneurs of the Arab world to come and invest here and to assist the Palestinians - and us - in spurring the economy.

Together, we can develop industrial areas that will generate thousands of jobs and create tourist sites that will attract millions of visitors eager to walk in the footsteps of history - in Nazareth and in Bethlehem, around the walls of Jericho and the walls of Jerusalem, on the banks of the Sea of Galilee and the baptismal site of the Jordan.

There is an enormous potential for archaeological tourism, if we can only learn to cooperate and to develop it.

I turn to you, our Palestinian neighbors, led by the Palestinian Authority, and I say: Let's begin

negotiations immediately without preconditions.

Israel is obligated by its international commitments and expects all parties to keep their commitments.

We want to live with you in peace, as good neighbors. We want our children and your children to never again experience war: that parents, brothers and sisters will never again know the agony of losing loved ones in battle; that our children will be able to dream of a better future and realize that dream; and that together we will invest our energies in plowshares and pruning hooks, not swords and spears.

I know the face of war. I have experienced battle. I lost close friends, I lost a brother. I have seen the pain of bereaved families. I do not want war. No one in Israel wants war.

If we join hands and work together for peace, there is no limit to the development and prosperity we can achieve for our two peoples - in the economy, agriculture, trade, tourism and education - most importantly, in providing our youth a better world in which to live, a life full of tranquility, creativity, opportunity and hope.

If the advantages of peace are so evident, we must ask ourselves why peace remains so remote, even as our hand remains outstretched to peace? Why has this conflict continued for more than sixty years?

In order to bring an end to the conflict, we must give an honest and forthright answer to the question: What is the root of the conflict?

In his speech to the first Zionist Conference in Basel, the founder of the Zionist movement, Theodore Herzl, said about the Jewish national home "This idea is so big that we must speak of it only in the simplest terms." Today, I will speak about the immense challenge of peace in the simplest words possible.

Even as we look toward the horizon, we must be firmly connected to reality, to the truth. And the simple truth is that the root of the conflict was, and remains, the refusal to recognize the right of the Jewish people to a state of their own, in their historic homeland.

In 1947, when the United Nations proposed the partition plan of a Jewish state and an Arab state, the entire Arab world rejected the resolution. The Jewish community, by contrast, welcomed it by dancing and rejoicing.

The Arabs rejected any Jewish state, in any borders.

Those who think that the continued enmity toward Israel is a product of our presence in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, is confusing cause and consequence.

The attacks against us began in the 1920s, escalated into a comprehensive attack in 1948 with the declaration of Israel's independence, continued with the fedayeen attacks in the 1950s, and climaxed in 1967, on the eve of the six-day war, in an attempt to tighten a noose around the neck of the State of Israel.

All this occurred during the fifty years before a single Israeli soldier ever set foot in Judea and Samaria .

Fortunately, Egypt and Jordan left this circle of enmity. The signing of peace treaties have brought about an end to their claims against Israel, an end to the conflict. But to our regret, this is not the case with the Palestinians. The closer we get to an agreement with them, the further they retreat and raise demands that are inconsistent with a true desire to end the conflict.

Many good people have told us that withdrawal from territories is the key to peace with the Palestinians. Well, we withdrew. But the fact is that every withdrawal was met with massive waves of terror, by suicide bombers and thousands of missiles.

We tried to withdraw with an agreement and without an agreement. We tried a partial withdrawal and a full withdrawal. In 2000 and again last year, Israel proposed an almost total withdrawal in exchange for an end to the conflict, and twice our offers were rejected.

We evacuated every last inch of the Gaza strip, we uprooted tens of settlements and evicted thousands of Israelis from their homes, and in response, we received a hail of missiles on our cities, towns and children.

The claim that territorial withdrawals will bring peace with the Palestinians, or at least advance peace, has up till now not stood the test of reality.

In addition to this, Hamas in the south, like Hezbollah in the north, repeatedly proclaims their commitment to "liberate" the Israeli cities of Ashkelon, Beersheba, Acre and Haifa.

Territorial withdrawals have not lessened the hatred, and to our regret, Palestinian moderates are not yet ready to say the simple words: Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish people, and it will stay that way.

Achieving peace will require courage and candor from both sides, and not only from the Israeli side.

The Palestinian leadership must arise and say: "Enough of this conflict. We recognize the right of the Jewish people to a state of their own in this land, and we are prepared to live beside you in true peace."

I am yearning for that moment, for when Palestinian leaders say those words to our people and to their people, then a path will be opened to resolving all the problems between our peoples, no matter how complex they may be.

Therefore, a fundamental prerequisite for ending the conflict is a public, binding and unequivocal Palestinian recognition of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people.

To vest this declaration with practical meaning, there must also be a clear understanding that the Palestinian refugee problem will be resolved outside Israel's borders. For it is clear that any demand for resettling Palestinian refugees within Israel undermines Israel's continued existence as the state of the Jewish people.

The Palestinian refugee problem must be solved, and it can be solved, as we ourselves proved in a similar situation. Tiny Israel successfully absorbed tens of thousands of Jewish refugees who left their homes and belongings in Arab countries.

Therefore, justice and logic demand that the Palestinian refugee problem be solved outside Israel's borders. On this point, there is a broad national consensus. I believe that with goodwill and international investment, this humanitarian problem can be permanently resolved.

So far I have spoken about the need for Palestinians to recognize our rights. In am moment, I will speak openly about our need to recognize their rights.

But let me first say that the connection between the Jewish people and the Land of Israel has lasted for more than 3500 years. Judea and Samaria, the places where Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, David and Solomon, and Isaiah and Jeremiah lived, are not alien to us. This is the land of our forefathers.

The right of the Jewish people to a state in the land of Israel does not derive from the catastrophes that have plagued our people. True, for 2000 years the Jewish people suffered expulsions, pogroms, blood libels, and massacres which culminated in a Holocaust - a suffering which has no parallel in human history.

There are those who say that if the Holocaust had not occurred, the state of Israel would never have been established. But I say that if the state of Israel would have been established earlier, the Holocaust would not have occurred.

This tragic history of powerlessness explains why the Jewish people need a sovereign power of self-defense.

But our right to build our sovereign state here, in the land of Israel, arises from one simple fact: this is the homeland of the Jewish people, this is where our identity was forged.

As Israel's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion proclaimed in Israel's Declaration of Independence: "The Jewish people arose in the land of Israel and it was here that its spiritual, religious and political character was shaped. Here they attained their sovereignty, and here they bequeathed to the world their national and cultural treasures, and the most eternal of books."

But we must also tell the truth in its entirety: within this homeland lives a large Palestinian community. We do not want to rule over them, we do not want to govern their lives, we do not want to impose either our flag or our culture on them.

In my vision of peace, in this small land of ours, two peoples live freely, side-by-side, in amity and mutual respect. Each will have its own flag, its own national anthem, its own government. Neither will threaten the security or survival of the other.

These two realities - our connection to the land of Israel, and the Palestinian population living within it - have created deep divisions in Israeli society. But the truth is that we have much more that unites us than divides us.

I have come tonight to give expression to that unity, and to the principles of peace and security on which there is broad agreement within Israeli society. These are the principles that guide our policy.

This policy must take into account the international situation that has recently developed. We must recognize this reality and at the same time stand firmly on those principles essential for Israel.

I have already stressed the first principle - recognition. Palestinians must clearly and unambiguously recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people. The second principle is: demilitarization. The territory under Palestinian control must be demilitarized with ironclad security provisions for Israel.

Without these two conditions, there is a real danger that an armed Palestinian state would emerge that would become another terrorist base against the Jewish state, such as the one in Gaza.

We don't want Kassam rockets on Petach Tikva, Grad rockets on Tel Aviv, or missiles on Ben-Gurion airport. We want peace.

In order to achieve peace, we must ensure that Palestinians will not be able to import missiles into their territory, to field an army, to close their airspace to us, or to make pacts with the likes of Hezbollah and Iran. On this point as well, there is wide consensus within Israel.

It is impossible to expect us to agree in advance to the principle of a Palestinian state without assurances that this state will be demilitarized.

On a matter so critical to the existence of Israel, we must first have our security needs addressed.

Therefore, today we ask our friends in the international community, led by the United States, for what is critical to the security of Israel: Clear commitments that in a future peace agreement, the territory controlled by the Palestinians will be demilitarized: namely, without an army, without control of its airspace, and with effective security measures to prevent weapons smuggling into the territory - real monitoring, and not what occurs in Gaza today. And obviously, the Palestinians will not be able to forge military pacts.

Without this, sooner or later, these territories will become another Hamastan. And that we cannot accept.

I told President Obama when I was in Washington that if we could agree on the substance, then the terminology would not pose a problem.

And here is the substance that I now state clearly:

If we receive this guarantee regarding demilitarization and Israel's security needs, and if the Palestinians recognize Israel as the State of the Jewish people, then we will be ready in a future peace agreement to reach a solution where a demilitarized Palestinian state exists alongside the Jewish state.

Regarding the remaining important issues that will be discussed as part of the final settlement, my positions are known: Israel needs defensible borders, and Jerusalem must remain the united capital of Israel with continued religious freedom for all faiths.

The territorial question will be discussed as part of the final peace agreement. In the meantime, we have no intention of building new settlements or of expropriating additional land for existing settlements.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; israel; middleeast; netanyahu; palestine; transcript; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2009 2:32:16 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CaptainAmiigaf

Ping for you


2 posted on 06/14/2009 2:39:03 PM PDT by Mrs. B.S. Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Netanyahu transcript ping


3 posted on 06/14/2009 2:42:22 PM PDT by GlennBeck08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Take that, Barack Hussein.


4 posted on 06/14/2009 2:45:55 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GlennBeck08

Thanks - I’ll read it right after supper.


5 posted on 06/14/2009 2:46:14 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I just had a baby, so I may not respond to your post. Nothing personal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Bibi called the haloed one's bluff. His conditions are not only fair, but given the history absolutely ncessary to the security of Israel and its people. But just as they are fair, they will be impossible to achieve. Hamas and the PA will never agree. The Arabs will never agree to resettlement in their lands. Obama will now have to openly decide. Does he support the security of an ally or does he publicly seek to remove Bibi from office.

I think we can look to a reexamination of the F 35 sales to Israel, as well as other weapons technology. A starting point to force Bibi from office.

6 posted on 06/14/2009 2:48:20 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

The 0bama response will be “Present.”


7 posted on 06/14/2009 2:50:36 PM PDT by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Wow quite a speech let’s see how it gets received by the Zero supporters in Gaza!


8 posted on 06/14/2009 2:51:32 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I wish we would back Israel. But Obama has already shown his colors on this issue. You would think that anyone who has read the Bible would not go against it like this Administration seems intent on doing.
Back a loser. End up wiping out the planet as we know it. Good luck Barry O God wins in the end...in spite of your muslim sympathies.


9 posted on 06/14/2009 2:55:07 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I posted this on another thread about a very weird thing developing over there in the Middle East, in regards to the Palestinians and the Israelis...


The weird thing I see happening now with the Palestinians and the Israelis, is that they have apparently gone the *opposite way* that one would think they would, concerning the two-state/one-state issue...

The Israelis are now arguing strongly against a one-state solution and definitely are for a two-state solution — basically because they don’t want all those Palestinians *inside* Israel proper and being able to vote. That would add millions of Palestinians to the voter rolls and enable them to boost out the Israeli politicians. That would completely change the “Jewish character” of Israel, as a “homeland for the Jews”.

And conversely, the Palestinians are going to be arguing for a “one-state solution:” — as they will see that this is the way that they can *sabotage* Israel, by putting all those millions of Palestinians *inside* Israel and being able to vote out Israeli politicians and put in Palestinian politicians and *take over Israel* from within, without resorting to any war at all...

It’s getting to be very weird over there, when one side switches with the other side for what you might think they would support... :-)


And so it goes...


10 posted on 06/14/2009 2:56:16 PM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Also, note this (about Israel and the Palestinians) in the context of the “world-wide takeover” of Islam (and this includes Islam taking over the U.S. too...).


Here is a video that shows the *guarantee* that Islam will be taking over the “West” (and the world) in a few short years — and without a doubt!

This is no joke! They’re going to be running things here in another generation. Take a look at this and you’ll see why.

Again, no hyperbole here, but a *certainty*...

Muslim Demographics...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

Then go over to this FReeper thread and get this latest video... (either download, or look at the abridged version or buy it...)...

“The Third Jihad” (video - abridged version of film)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2271522/posts

As it stands right now..., the “West” is sunk and Islam is going to be ruling this country in short order. And this has absolutely nothing to do with Obama or the Democrats — rather it has to do with what is shown in that video...


I would say that the West and the U.S. is in their *death throes* right now...


11 posted on 06/14/2009 2:58:26 PM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
The palestinians started moving towards the "one state" solution as soon as the separation fence codified the "facts on the ground". Likewise, the Israeli right realized that with the separation fence a "two state" solution would lead to a set of bantustans, which is perfectly tolerable to the intelligentsia although not so much to the rank and file.

This will not end well. I really wonder if Obama knows what he's gotten himself into. I'm sure he sees himself as the second coming of Alexander but this is one Gordian knot he won't cut so easily.

12 posted on 06/14/2009 3:09:42 PM PDT by ketsu (ItÂ’s not a campaign. ItÂ’s a taxpayer-funded farewell tour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Even as we look toward the horizon, we must be firmly connected to reality, to the truth. And the simple truth is that the root of the conflict was, and remains, the refusal to recognize the right of the Jewish people to a state of their own, in their historic homeland.

In 1947, when the United Nations proposed the partition plan of a Jewish state and an Arab state, the entire Arab world rejected the resolution. The Jewish community, by contrast, welcomed it by dancing and rejoicing.

The Arabs rejected any Jewish state, in any borders.

Here is where he stopped patting them on the back and got serious. This is something the Palestinians and other muslims will never agree to. That and the unarmed Palestinian state.

The first part of the speech sounds as if he is going to give Bozo what the wants, then he kicks him right in the old gonads. Good for Bibi.

13 posted on 06/14/2009 3:10:05 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Obama might make nice about the speech but it is really DOA. He did not end settlements. Further, he calls for capitulation from Arabs and Palestinians—a non-militarized, unarmed Palestine while Israel retains is military, including nuclear weapons. Who’s to guarantee Palestinian soveriegnty against Israeli action?

Unfortunately, I think that this is simply an attempt to play for time and not an honest readiness to negotiate and settle. Israel loses by this.


14 posted on 06/14/2009 3:10:38 PM PDT by Matthew Weaver (America First.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

You know, you are really irritating with the doom and gloom. Just thought I would let you know, no need to answer me because I won’t answer you.


15 posted on 06/14/2009 3:11:34 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Matthew Weaver
Nope, you are wrong. Israel gains by it. Palestinians don't need to be armed. Israelis will not attack them if they aren't shooting missiles into Israel. This will not hurt Israel but will help them. The main statement was to force the muslims to recognize Israel as a legal Jewish state, the muslims won't agree to that, neither will they agree to be disarmed. Therefore they are not ready for peace and since they are the real instigators of war and death in the middle east the onus is on them.

Anyone who thinks Israel attacks without provocation has to be a muslim or a complete fool.

16 posted on 06/14/2009 3:15:20 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: calex59

You said — You know, you are really irritating with the doom and gloom. Just thought I would let you know, no need to answer me because I won’t answer you.

Okay, I won’t expect you to answer..., no worries there... :-)

BUT, what one (i.e., *anyone*) should know is that it’s ABSOLUTELY GUARANTEED — without a doubt, that Islam *will take over the West* — by simply Demographics alone.

This isn’t an “iffy” situation. This is *absolutely guaranteed* that the “West” is sunk — and they *are* in their death throes right now — because just in the United States alone, we’ve killed 50 million babies. Those weren’t Muslim babies, but would have been *mostly* Western, U.S. citizens and culturally of the West mindset.

We’ve basically *killed our future* — and we have *handed it over* to the Muslims...

No joking here, no hyperbole, but just the *facts*....


17 posted on 06/14/2009 3:15:58 PM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
I would say that the West and the U.S. is in their *death throes* right now...
The Islamic world is small potatoes. China and India are currently poised to succeed the west as western economies collapse under their own weight.

Go to any American or European University and look at the graduate school. That will show you were the future is.

18 posted on 06/14/2009 3:16:18 PM PDT by ketsu (ItÂ’s not a campaign. ItÂ’s a taxpayer-funded farewell tour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

They did well when they purchased their fighters from France.
And look for them to explore other arms suppliers as well.


19 posted on 06/14/2009 3:18:26 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

To see how “small potatoes” it is..., you need to see this video... :-)

Muslim Demographics...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

Oh, and then after you see it, then ask yourself “How many babies are the Chinese having?”

And double check with India, too..., while you’re at it... :-)


20 posted on 06/14/2009 3:19:00 PM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson