The fact that you term a “negative emotion” to the term “half-breed” was YOUR interpretation, not mine.
My intent, in part, was to invoke a “nostalgic emotion” along with a description of Obama that clarifies what he is. I stripped him bare, as he intends to do to the rest of us. Be warned, Obama despises free Americans. He thinks of us as his mortal servants in his farcical immortal world, I simply claim he is nothing more than the sum of his parts. He is flesh and blood, and he hasn’t improved on his humanity. I have. I’m a half-breed, and much, much more. He isn’t.
How am I a racist for proclaiming that Obama has no race? Those of us “ half-breeds” in society need to work twice as hard to be accepted into society. I work my ass off. I embrace this human challenge. Obama seeks to eliminate the challenge and belittle us all unless we submit to him. I don’t.
Obama can defend himself. He doesn’t need your help. If he’s more than a half-breed, then prove it to me. So far, he’s proven he’s full of hatred for his fellow man. “Rise above your lack of race Obama, you petty looter!” is my message to him.
So much for FreeRepublic, if the few offended make it FauxRepublic.
MY interpretation is HALF of the communication process. That's the point I'm trying to make.
And when your comments are ripped out of context by a hostile left-wing media and used to flog conservatives, then your interpretation becomes far, far less than half of the communication.