Posted on 05/28/2009 4:59:36 PM PDT by Coleus
“Obama's NASA selection is a boost for manned spaceflight” proclaimed the headline to the May 24 Los Angeles Times story. Apparently, “the choice of astronaut Charles Bolden as NASA administrator reassures many who feared that Obama was lukewarm on future manned missions,” and is being interpreted as supporting NASA’s goal of humans once again going to the moon by 2020.
“Clearly Charlie Bolden would not have taken the job if he were being asked to shut down human spaceflight," said John Logsdon, a space policy expert in Washington, according to the Times. If approved by the Senate to take the captain’s chair for NASA, Bolden would be the first African American, and the second astronaunt, to head the agency. Richard H. Truly, a retired Navy vice admiral and former shuttle commander, led the agency from 1989 to 1992.
Bolden’s Senate approval may be stalled by an Obama executive order that aims to eliminate conflicts of interest. As the Times put it, the new ethics rules prohibit appointees “from doing work that is ‘directly and substantially related’ to a former employer or former clients.” Bolden was on the board of directors for GenCorp Inc. until March 2008, and GenCorp’s Aerojet subsidiary is a contractor for the space shuttle and the Orion spacecraft programs, producing propulsion systems and maneuvering engines. Some form of “limited waiver” would probably be required for Bolden to bypass these regulations.
Whether or not Bolden deserves to circumvent these rules, or if the rules actually serve any purpose at all if a waiver to bypass them can easily be obtained, remains to be seen. But one thing that must be kept in sight is the fact that NASA isn’t the only game in town for manned space exploration.
The website RedOrbit.com dealt with “NASA’s Free-Market Solution” on May 12. “NASA Administrator Chris Scolese told a congressional subcommittee … that the agency intends to provide $150 million in stimulus-package money to private companies that design, build and service their own rockets and crew capsules. This is spacecraft that could send astronauts in orbit while NASA works to finish building the space shuttle’s replacements.” In fact, “the White House ordered a complete review of the entire manned space program to be led by long time friend of private space ventures, former Lockheed Martin CEO of Norman Augustine.” While it may be argued that if big government didn’t take so much tax money from businesses and individuals in the first place, there would be no need for government to dole out “stimulus money,” RedOrbit.com nonetheless interprets NASA’s generosity as evidence that “the space agency … and the Obama administration are both ready to promote and make possible commercial human space flight.”
NASA will be awarding $80 million in stimulus money to the private company with the best “crewed launch demo.” Top contenders are space-flight companies SpaceX and Orbital Sciences. “These leading contractors are building their launch vehicles from scratch. Their designs highlight incredibly efficient business models with low manufacturing costs.” They somehow need “only a few dozen employees at their launch sites” rather than “the space shuttle program’s 15,000 workers.” Former NASA administrator Michael Griffin believes that “when we engage the engine of competition, these services will be provided in a more cost-effective fashion than when the government has to do it.”
This is not without precedent. RedOrbit recalls that “in October 2004, engineer Burt Rutan's SpaceShipOne won the $10 million Ansari X Prize. His rocket was the first privately built flying machine to ever reach space.” William Watson, the executive director of the Space Frontier Foundation — a group promoting commercial space activities — sees similar exciting opportunities: “Let's have an American competition in space — to create good jobs, fuel innovation and close the [spaceflight] gap more quickly.” He adds: "With private funds matching government investment, we can dramatically leverage taxpayer dollars to produce breakthroughs in a new American industry — commercial orbital human spaceflight.”
But how about private funds without government investment? If exploring the vast frontier of space is worth doing, why wouldn't entrepreneurs invest in it? That’s the kind of boldly going where no one has gone before which any supporter of free enterprise would like to see live long and prosper. Only a Star Trek fan may understand all the references in that last sentence, but anyone who supports the free market will likely wish to see the American spirit of private innovation do its part to help conquer the final frontier.
I looked for it. And I found it.
Does that make me a racist, or merely someone who catches on eventually?
You missed the part where he is a lobbyist. His skin color was a birth issue, his lobbyist background a volitional one. He should not be approved based on his conflicts of interest.
He is also a USMC brigadier general. Are you suggesting he was a political appointee?
I'm not suggesting anything. I thought my comment was crystal clear. Obama made an appointment. I checked to see if the appointee was anything other than a white male. Lo.
So did you figure it out yet?
Son, why don’t you antangonize somebody else?
So is this guy a New Black Panther member? /s
I have no qualms about Bolden, but I am a little worried about the nominee for for the Deputy Administrator, Lori Garver. She was the one who conducted the infamous exit interview with then NASA administrator, Michael Griffin. I don’t think it was intended to be an exit interview, but during the course of it, Dr. Griffin became so incensed tha he was screaming to speak directly to Obama. With the amount of international negotiation that NASA has to do, I hope that this sort of reaction isn’t common.
Nonsense, there is no way any private company could build a shuttle replacement within 6 years with a budget like that. This is just the same corporate welfare that's characterized NASA for the last 30 years. I have no problem paying a company to accomplish something; but just giving them money so they can keep busy is another matter entirely.
But there are lots of astronauts, and lots of really smart people, and lots of qualified people. I just wondered if Obama could be counted upon to pick one that wasn't white and wasn't male.
I might have to start posting instructions with my posts.
I don’t see a lot on project management, but lots of piloting. He has a compelling story, though. The last guy was an embarrassment at the end, even had his wife begging Obama to let him keep the job!
...lol...
I wonder if looter guy will get a job with Zero. Secretary of Heineken.
Ping
Are you saying that General Bond is unqualified and is only being named because he's black?
Well, am I?
I would prefer an administrator with and engineering background and experience in aerospace development. But I doubt seriously that NASA will do a thing worthwhile in the next decade except the robotics exploration and communications tie-ins. Manned spaceflight since the moon landings is almost a complete joke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.