Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
I suppose water vapor spewing from smokestacks is pollution?

In context, yes. Depending on where it is spewing, it could be. Most places, no.

To totally ignore context is to look foolish.

What about nitrogen fertilizer? It helps plant growth, so dumping it MUST be good...it CAN'T be a pollutant by the claims here. Yet, if you put more onto the soil than the system can handle, it can mean contaminated groundwater or surfacewater that can cause death or eutrophy lakes excessively.

17 posted on 05/26/2009 5:44:28 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
In context, yes. Depending on where it is spewing, it could be. Most places, no.

Where is water vapor coming from a smokestack a pollutant? Where is carbon dioxide coming from a smokestack a pollutant?

18 posted on 05/26/2009 7:23:01 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson