Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike Huckabee Compares Abortion to Slavery, NAACP Leader Upset by Remarks
Life News ^ | 3/24/09 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 03/24/2009 11:04:21 AM PDT by wagglebee

Jefferson City, MO (LifeNews.com) -- Former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee compared abortion to slavery during a speaking engagement at a recent pro-life event. However, his comments are drawing criticism from a leader of the NAACP, the nation's largest civil rights group.

During a Monday speech for the Missouri-based Vitae Caring Foundation, which creates and sponsors pro-life television advertisements across the country, Huckabee made the remarks.

Huckabee said that, when the United States abolished slavery, it got rid of the concept that one person had the powerful life and death decision over another. he said such a decision was wrong when it came to slavery and equally wrong with regard to abortion.

"What are we saying to the generation coming after us when we tell them that it is perfectly OK for one person to own another human being?" Huckabee said.

"I thought we dealt with that 150 years ago when the issue of slavery was finally settled in this country, and we decided that it no longer was a political issue, it wasn't an issue of geography, it was an issue of morality," Huckabee added. "That it was either right or it was immoral that one person could own another human being and have full control even to the point of life and death over that other human being."

He said civilization cannot survive if "one group of people have life and death control over another for no particular reason other than their own conveniences and, in that case, prejudices."

Missouri NAACP President Mary Ratliff was upset by the speech and told the Associated Press the abortion-slavery comparison was "'apples to oranges."

She called it "offensive" to use slavery to make a point about another political issue.

"It seems to me now that when folks want to object to some kind of morality type of issue, they want to attach it to slavery," Ratliff told AP.

Huckabee has made the abortion-slavery comparison before.

Huckabee was the governor of Arkansas prior to launching a bid for the Republican nomination for president in 2008. He ran a surprisingly strong campaign and is seen as a potential top-tier candidate for the GOP nomination in 2012 against pro-abortion President Barack Obama.

During the campaign, he told Fox News that abortion shouldn't just be a state issue and discussed how slavery was abolished at the federal level.

"Well, it’s the logic of the Civil War," Huckabee said at the time. "If morality is the point here, and if it’s right or wrong, not just a political question, then you can't have 50 different versions of what’s right and what’s wrong."

"Can you have states saying slavery is OK, other states saying it’s not?" he continued. "If abortion is a moral issue--and for many of us it is, and I know for others it’s not. So if you decide that it’s just a political issue, then that’s a perfectly acceptable, logical conclusion. But for those of us for whom this is a moral question, you can't simply have 50 different versions of what’s right."

Black pro-life advocates have had issues with the NAACP over abortion before.

Rev. Clenard Childress, a New Jersey pastor, and a leader of the black pro-life group LEARN, protested the 2008 national convention of the NAACP.

Childress says that, historically, the NAACP "has failed to address the concerns of many of its delegates about abortion."

He pointed to a 2004 resolution voicing support for “equal access to abortion” and urging its members to participate in a pro-abortion rally in Washington. Then, in 2007, the NAACP, for the second time in four years, blocked a proposed resolution expressing opposition to abortion.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; mikehuckabee; moralabsolutes; naacp; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: wagglebee

Slavery was a PRIVILEGE, compared to the lethality of Abortionism! And, think how much BETTER off the decendents of the slaves are, compared to those left behind in Africa!


41 posted on 03/24/2009 11:37:42 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga
It bothers me that this genocide continues (thanks to Margeret Sanger and other lovers of Eugenics) and my black people aren’t up in arms about it. We should be angry about this!

I couldn't agree more!

More than 15 MILLION BLACK BABIES have been murdered since 1973, more blacks are killed in abortuaries EVERY TWO DAYS than have died in racial crimes (lynchings, etc.) in the past 150 years. As reprehensible as slavery was, systematic murder was not one of its components.

42 posted on 03/24/2009 11:38:18 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Abort! Abort! Abort!

43 posted on 03/24/2009 11:39:02 AM PDT by MarineBrat (The New York Times is a Communist Kamikaze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“It seems to me now that when folks want to object to some kind of morality type of issue, they want to attach it to slavery,” Ratliff told AP.

Maybe she is right. Slavers didn’t neccessarily plan to kill the slaves - just exploit them. This contrasts with abortionists and babies.


44 posted on 03/24/2009 11:40:58 AM PDT by ZULU (Obamanation of Desolation is President. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Slavery ruined lives. Abortion destroys lives.


45 posted on 03/24/2009 11:41:39 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Forcing a woman to bear an unwanted fetus is slavery and the government is the slave master.


46 posted on 03/24/2009 11:45:40 AM PDT by Misterioso (Obama was elected not in spite of his color but because of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The NAACP sure wasn’t upset when the homosexual lobby compares themselves to the civil rights protesters.


47 posted on 03/24/2009 11:47:03 AM PDT by Obadiah (Party - my house - on December 22, 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The NAACP used to point out bad things that whites did and rightly so.

Now unfortunately

The NAACP protects bad things that blacks do which is not good.

What happened to “content of character”?


48 posted on 03/24/2009 11:47:12 AM PDT by BillT (New Executive Order to abolish the WS Constitution to be signed to save the US Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
Forcing a woman to bear an unwanted fetus is slavery and the government is the slave master.

Was this sarcasm?

49 posted on 03/24/2009 11:51:01 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“It seems to me now that when folks want to object to some kind of morality type of issue, they want to attach it to slavery,” Ratliff told AP.

Morality? Where it not for the morality of white men, men who gave their lives for your freedom, you would still be picking cotton.

Apparently the NAACP have interpreted Martin Luther King’s dream, as not so important as to include the living unborn in his cry for freedom.

They are willing slaves, bound in shackles of their own mind by ignorance, hate and by their own hands..... frankly, they are stupid.


50 posted on 03/24/2009 12:08:03 PM PDT by Gator113 (For America to Survive, Obama Must Fail..... Obama=Failure in Chief with the Audacity of Dope.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillT

It’s become a racist political organization.


51 posted on 03/24/2009 12:09:07 PM PDT by MrB (irreconcilable: One of two or more conflicting ideas or beliefs that cannot be brought into harmony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"It seems to me now that when folks want to object to some kind of morality type of issue, they want to attach it to slavery," Ratliff told AP.

Maybe because it's the worst thing people can think of. Slaves got treated a lot better than aborted babies. They were fed, clothed and housed. They were not butchered, not used for immoral medical experiments and thrown in garbage bins like utter garbage.

52 posted on 03/24/2009 12:16:13 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Forcing a woman to bear an unwanted fetus is slavery and the government is the slave master.

Was this sarcasm?

Ten bucks says he was serious.

53 posted on 03/24/2009 12:24:37 PM PDT by Nighttime in America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Why isn't the NAACP upset that abortion is the #1 killer of African-Americans? I get p!ssed off when I think about it, and I'm a white chick.
54 posted on 03/24/2009 2:21:50 PM PDT by grellis (I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

For once I agree with a statement made by the NAALCP.

It is an apples and oranges argument.

Any comparison between between abortion and slavery does a disservice to abortion. Abortion is incalculably worse.

The only valid comparison is to the holocaust.


55 posted on 03/24/2009 2:58:20 PM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

What makes you think it is sarcasm?


56 posted on 03/24/2009 3:34:43 PM PDT by Misterioso (Obama was elected not in spite of his color but because of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: All
Pinged from Terri Dailies


57 posted on 03/24/2009 4:47:25 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“It seems to me now that when folks want to object to some kind of morality type of issue, they want to attach it to slavery,” Ratliff told AP.

Libs sure don’t mind using slavery when it fits into their agenda....it just peeves them that the other side can play those games too. Apples to oranges?? what an idiot. it’s humans (babies) to humans (slaves)....duh...idiot. moron. vessel of stupidity...


58 posted on 03/24/2009 4:54:57 PM PDT by DrewsMum (Comcast sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Most slave owners wouldn’t kill a slave because they were EXPENSIVE.

In those days, the DANGEROUS work was done by the "Paddys" - a slave was considered too valuable to put at risk.

59 posted on 03/24/2009 5:15:35 PM PDT by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot child is in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso; wagglebee
What makes you think it is sarcasm?

I was wondering the same thing. The reason I thought it might be sarcasm is because it's the stupidest, most liberal, satanic thing I've seen on FR in a very long time.

60 posted on 03/24/2009 5:50:10 PM PDT by BykrBayb (May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson