Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Europe’s Way of Encouraging Solar Power Arrives in the U.S.
New York Times ^ | March 12, 2009 | Kate Galbraith

Posted on 03/14/2009 9:15:33 PM PDT by Lorianne

Solar cells adorn the roofs of many homes and warehouses across Germany, while the bright white blades of wind turbines are a frequent sight against the sky in Spain.

If one day these machines become as common on the plains and rooftops of the United States as they are abroad, it may be because the financing technique that gave Europe an early lead in renewable energy is starting to cross the Atlantic.

Put simply, the idea is to pay homeowners and businesses top dollar for producing green energy. In Germany, for example, a homeowner with a rooftop solar system may be paid four times more to produce electricity than the rate paid to a coal-fired power plant.

This month Gainesville, Fla., became the first city in the United States to introduce higher payments for solar power, which is otherwise too expensive for many families or businesses to install. City leaders, who control their electric utility, unanimously approved the policy after studying Germany’s solar-power expansion.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Chgogal
"I’d like to know how solar power works in Buffalo NY or Chicago Ill?"

Not very good. Less that 10 hours a day of sunshine plus it's at a lower angle to boot. The sunlight looses more energy because it has to pass through more of the atmosphere. Solar water heaters don't work very well either. It's a lot of expense to get maybe an hours worth of warm water. Small windmills would be a much better investment but they aren't very pretty especially in an urban neighborhood, and if everyone had one on a 50 foot tower, the noise would be grating on everyones nerves before long.

21 posted on 03/14/2009 10:32:18 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red6

Agreed. Wind generators only make sense for solar backup for homes at high elevations in the west, where the wind speed increases every time a cloud drifts overhead. Even with those conditions, the bearings will burn on a generator that’s too cheaply made.

The solar plants with steam turbines can work for greater power needs (manufacturing plants, etc.) in the west, but nuclear power plants are needed in the Midwest and the East.


22 posted on 03/14/2009 10:44:04 PM PDT by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair
I'm not too hard on solar. And do you have any idea how much a grid tie inverter costs? Yes, you can set up a little emergency system with a few decent solar panels and a couple of marine batteries. With a little wire you can set up a "green" circuit in your house to run some 24 volt florescent lights (the same kind you use to replace regular incandescent bulbs) and a small portable TV. You can even run a coffee maker and a microwave for about 15 min worth of occasional running.

But you can save a lot of money and just buy one of those $100 1000 watt gas generators and a couple gallons of gas to run the circuit for 24 hours.

If your power still isn't on by then you can siphon some gas out of your car.

You solar panels system would have quit long before that however.

The solar panels would cost you about $1000 for 2 decent 8 amp output ones; $160 for two 1000 amp marine batteries, and $140-$180 for a 1200 watt inverter, another $50-$100 for a charge controller. All for about 4 hours emergency power for a couple lights and a TV, and IF you don't run the microwave or coffee maker for more than a few mins.

Not very cost effective, is it.

23 posted on 03/14/2009 10:52:21 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red6
"I bet you don’t sort your trash into ten different piles either?!?!?!?!"

Am I supposed to do that? LoL! Not a chance. Anything that burns goes into the wood stove, even plastic bottles, They throw off a lot of heat for a while, especially when you get a good blob of plastic going. Sure, it's not very good for the chimney pipes, but I clean them regularly, so creosote build up isn't a worry.

Anything I'm a bit leary about burning goes into the outside burning barrel. I have very little garbage to take to the garbage pit, maybe a couple bags worth every 2 months or so. In the summer, organic waste goes into the compost pit.

I'm thinking of building a very large organic waste pit to make a methane gas generator that will run a gas stove, and maybe, even a small gas furnace/space heater. I've seen a few good designs that some people claim work pretty good for them as long as you have enough "stuff" to toss into them. If you don't have farm animals, you can bail up some green hay in the fall and use that all winter to feed the digester.

24 posted on 03/14/2009 11:04:57 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
The problem with all those on the green bandwagon is that it's popularist garbage. Cost, reliability, and in transportation weight and volume given the amount of stored energy all work against green power. Sure there are some applications where it makes sense and is even economically viable, but what we're seeing now is a deliberate push by state, local, and federal governments for these power sources. Inevitably what they will do is create artificial market constructs that do nothing other than hide the real costs in order to further some utopian vision which the average layperson will pay for, no matter where they hide these costs.
25 posted on 03/14/2009 11:23:49 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: familyop

I have a friend in a solar on the grid company. He says it still only makes sense in the expensive Kalifornia markets.


27 posted on 03/15/2009 12:18:43 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

“Europe’s Way” serves the same purpose.


28 posted on 03/15/2009 12:53:51 AM PDT by cydcharisse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Has it ever occurred to you guys that the greenies’ method of funding solar & wind amounts to the equivalent of pointing a windmill-powered fan at a windmill?


29 posted on 03/15/2009 3:16:48 AM PDT by BobbyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
You are wrong it is not on the backs of tax payers!
It's on the backs of every consumer.

After all, the end user consumer of any goods and/or service pay all taxes related to that good and/or service.

So cut your spending by 15% and let your politicians know why you are cutting the government's revenue.

30 posted on 03/15/2009 4:54:22 AM PDT by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“the bright white blades of wind turbines are a frequent sight against the sky in Spain.”

Where’s Don Quixote when we need him?


31 posted on 03/15/2009 5:51:58 AM PDT by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? - Jer.17:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
"...advocates do not believe they have the votes in Congress to adopt a national feed-in tariff system like the ones in Germany and Spain. They are putting their hopes, instead, on proposals in Congress to mandate that a certain percentage of electricity comes from renewables.

They can't muster the votes for a tax so they will just mandate that the power companies buy the green power at above-market rates. The result will be that we subsidize wind & solar by shifting the higher costs to coal & gas. We're not making wind & solar cheaper, we are increasing the cost of producing electricity. As always, the increased costs are paid by the customers.

32 posted on 03/15/2009 7:13:49 AM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Are you saying that the sun causes “Global Warming”? lol


33 posted on 03/15/2009 7:34:48 AM PDT by TheFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson