Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: No earmarks, after this
Raleigh News & Obstructor ^ | March 12. 2009 | Steven Thomma and David Lightman

Posted on 03/12/2009 4:08:16 AM PDT by NCDragon

He says the spending bill, which includes thousands of them, is too important to wait.

WASHINGTON -- As a candidate, Barack Obama once said that a president has to be able to do more than one thing at a time. Wednesday he proved it, though not in the way he had in mind.

He criticized pork-barrel spending in the form of "earmarks," urging changes in the way that Congress adopts the spending proposals. Then he signed a spending bill that contains nearly 9,000 of them, some that members of his own staff shoved in last year when they were still members of Congress.

"Let there be no doubt, this piece of legislation must mark an end to the old way of doing business, and the beginning of a new era of responsibility and accountability," Obama said.

He said, however, that it was crucial for him to sign the $410 billion bill as soon as it arrived at the White House from Congress because it's needed to finance much of the government for the rest of this fiscal year. It was largely written last year but was held back while Republican George W. Bush was president because he opposed it.

"I am signing an imperfect ... bill," Obama said, "because it's necessary for the ongoing functions of government, and we have a lot more work to do. We can't have Congress bogged down at this critical juncture in our economic recovery."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsobserver.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; brokenpromises; earmarks; yeahright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: NCDragon

If Obama ever tries to stop one of Nancy’s spending bills, she will say things in public that will hurt his feelings. She will get very mean and nasty. He will cry. The media will turn against him and she will win.


21 posted on 03/12/2009 4:42:43 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon
“I am signing an imperfect ... bill,” Obama said, “because it's necessary for the ongoing functions of government, and we have a lot more work to do. We can't have Congress bogged down at this critical juncture in our economic recovery.”

This sorry piece of crap has an excuse a minute for the sorry job he and Congress foist on the American people. Anyone that believes a word coming out of his mouth should be locked up for the safety of society.

22 posted on 03/12/2009 4:45:06 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 141)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

Honey, I promise never to slug you in the face again and give you another black eye...honestly!


23 posted on 03/12/2009 4:50:44 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Hussein has had several of those already to no effect. He is doing just what his supporters want, unlike George HW Bush.


24 posted on 03/12/2009 4:50:46 AM PDT by arthurus ( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

“...said Steve Ellis, the vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a budget watchdog group ‘We appreciate how he kept them out of the stimulus, but we think he’s only batting .500.’”

If even a group called the “Taxpayers for Common Sense” can be so nonsensical as to believe that the (first?) Spendulus bill did not contain the equivalent of many billions in earmarks, then we are all in serious trouble.


25 posted on 03/12/2009 4:51:09 AM PDT by BuddhaBrown (Path to enlightenment: Four right turns, then go straight until you see the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

There will still be earmarks, but they will call them something else. Any guesses?


26 posted on 03/12/2009 4:52:18 AM PDT by ConservativeByChoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

I quit smoking too.


27 posted on 03/12/2009 4:57:54 AM PDT by revtown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
Anything the government is in charge of is corrupt. It is a natural law in Economics. Bureaucrats are making market decisions and their motivations are not market related and even if they were, bureaucrats' incomes do not derive from economic right decisions and they cannot read market signals because they do not see them, even assuming bureaucrats are motivated for "the common good." When bureaucrats make the decisions then businessmen must buy their decisions from the bureaucrats and thus Corruption. It cannot be any other way because the "honest" bureaucrat or politician cannot get decisions made or implemented nearly so well as the corrupt one can and has no way of knowing what economically correct decisions are.

Businessmen are not necessarily honest and most embrace corruption whenever it helps their business. When they have to operate in an unhampered market they are kept honest and socially beneficial by the exigencies of the market. When they are not, they fail. When Bureaucracy defines and controls the market only corruption can succeed or even exist.

28 posted on 03/12/2009 5:02:34 AM PDT by arthurus ( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: linn37

Truth is what the Party says it is. Everything else is Lie.


29 posted on 03/12/2009 5:03:43 AM PDT by arthurus ( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

My name is Barry Soetero, and I’m a spendaholic.

But no more after this one ..... I swear on my mother’s grave


30 posted on 03/12/2009 5:15:04 AM PDT by silverleaf (Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeByChoice

There will still be earmarks, but they will call them something else. Any guesses?

“Targeted stimuli”


31 posted on 03/12/2009 5:16:12 AM PDT by silverleaf (Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Ah yes, a Pharoh and his frogs.....perfect!

32 posted on 03/12/2009 5:16:56 AM PDT by BigLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BigLittle

33 posted on 03/12/2009 5:23:48 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological personalities." - Dune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

Great...now we’ve a president who thinks he’s doing standup comedy..?


34 posted on 03/12/2009 5:26:16 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

Lier, lier pants on fire.


35 posted on 03/12/2009 5:27:46 AM PDT by JamesA (He who hesitates is lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon
I will respect you in the morning, the check is in the mail, and I will not....
36 posted on 03/12/2009 5:29:22 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (You want me to buy heavy metal? Metallica?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon

What are they saying about this at DU? Their boy prezident has broken a lot of campaign promises already. Have they noticed or are they still venting about Bush?


37 posted on 03/12/2009 5:44:23 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCDragon
"Thish ish my LAST botter of Scosh, I SHWEAR! After thish botter of Scosh, I am going on the wagon, I SHWEAR!"
38 posted on 03/12/2009 5:52:54 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I must confess photoshop envy. Nice work. :-)


39 posted on 03/12/2009 6:05:19 AM PDT by 1curiousmind (OBAMANTICIPOINTMENT is palpable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GBA
What are they saying about this at DU?

Everything is still Bush's fault....the old administration needs to be investigated and go to jail....Rush sucks.

40 posted on 03/12/2009 6:07:25 AM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson