Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MATC Instructor, an Unlikely Love Guru; Says There is a Science to Staying in Love
Wisconsin State Journal ^ | February 13, 2009 | Melanie Conklin

Posted on 02/13/2009 5:27:57 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin

While falling in love can be as random as cupid's arrow, there is a science to staying in love.

So says Madison Area Technical College instructor Marline Pearson, who has melded her background in history, criminology and sociology together to become an unlikely love guru. She helps students navigate and control the thorny and mysterious realms of love, relationships, living together, sex, parenting and marriage.

To Pearson, the connection between her past work and relationship skills is clear.

"Here is a message I want you to take home," Pearson told her most recent MATC class. "Relationships are not neutral. They affect everything else in your life. There's nothing like a messed up love life to cause you emotional strain and a messed up work life and a messed up school life."

Pearson has also altered her course for people at risk for what she labels relationship turbulence. She's taught the Within My Reach program, which she coauthored, for the UW Odyssey Program, Milwaukee's Head Start, Operation Fresh Start, area high schools and other community groups.

"My focus on criminology led me to develop a keen focus on at-risk kids, adolescents and families," Pearson said. "Sure there are other very important factors like economics, culture and community. But family breakdown also has a huge impact on kids. That got me doing research on why some couples make it and others don't."

Five years ago, Pearson's class was featured in Time magazine, which called it a "new breed of romantic counseling — equal parts sex ed, social science and Dear Abby." The article said such classes offer healthy models of love that fill a void between an emotionless biology of sex education and preachy abstinence lectures.

Pearson can't be lumped in with either group. She speaks to gay couples, believes that planned commitment to a future together is more vital than a marriage certificate and has a strident emphasis on getting people safely out of harmful relationships, such as ones that involve domestic violence.

"As a political progressive and a feminist, I don't for one minute see (a relationship class) as the only thing that helps," Pearson said. "The good thing today is that there's growing agreement among liberals and conservatives that there really are distinct advantages for children when adults in the home have a stable relationship."

Pearson, 58, can attest to that. She's been married to her husband, Rob Kennedy for 25 years.

Her popular one-credit MATC relationship class, taught over the course of two full Saturdays, begins with students making drawings that respond to a phrase on the board: "Relationships (or marriages) today are like..."

Her most recent class produced drawings of a cheetah chasing a gazelle, a gold-digger, a road with potholes and couples writhing in agony in a trash can.

In other classes she asks participants to build a sculpture out of play dough, toothpicks, marshmallows and more to represent their relationship. "My class isn't therapy, but when you do different mediums, it gets people talking."

In this class, as well as her semester-long marriage and the family course, she talks to students about how the traditional road maps are gone.

"People don't ask people out on dates much anymore," Pearson said. "In old-fashioned dating things were a whole lot clearer. Somebody asks a person out. That indicates a clear intent."

Now hooking-up has replaced dating, which she dubs more sliding than deciding: People ending up having sex or living together without ever really making a thought-out decision.

When people have babies many take a birthing class and read such books as "What to Expect When You're Expecting." Pearson dreams of a day when couples approach marriage in much the same way, taking a skills-based class and making sure they have compatible expectations.

"How much do people spend on a wedding and how much time do they spend planning it?" she asks the class. Students suggest $10,000 to $30,000 and loads of time. She responds, "What if people spent even a tiny fraction of that preparing for a marriage?"


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Our tax dollars at work! This is a TEACHER at a local Technical College. Yeesh!
1 posted on 02/13/2009 5:27:57 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Forgive me, I’m a little bit inebriated. However I will take this one and run with it.

This generation (my generation) has not learned to socialize in the same way pervious generations have. We’re socially maladapted to life. I’ve seen people who are supposedly good friends walk up to each other and have a VERY awkward conversation, but they can SMS back and forth with ease. We’ve taken the “social” out of socializing.

Needless to say, this has caused a phase-shift in the dating world. People don’t know how to deal with each other. It is quite literally an alien world. Things that came naturally to the generation before us have been lost. It’s quite sad really. Were I sober, I’d have more to impart. Cheers!


2 posted on 02/13/2009 5:43:01 PM PST by AntiKev ("Within the strangest people, truth can find the strangest home." - Great Big Sea - Company of Fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

bookmark


3 posted on 02/13/2009 5:45:41 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiKev

I’ll have what you’re having, LOL!

Sounded reasonable to me.

However, do we need a TEACHER at Taxpayer Expense teaching this in Science class? I think not.


4 posted on 02/13/2009 5:49:24 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Yea. She is really a looney one! Imagine, thinking that old-fashioned dating is better than just hooking up!

“People don’t ask people out on dates much anymore,” Pearson said. “In old-fashioned dating things were a whole lot clearer. Somebody asks a person out. That indicates a clear intent.”

Now hooking-up has replaced dating, which she dubs more sliding than deciding: People ending up having sex or living together without ever really making a thought-out decision.


5 posted on 02/13/2009 5:52:44 PM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Science class?

I didn't read that it was a science class.

6 posted on 02/13/2009 5:53:56 PM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

good gor her. people get divorced at the drop a hat with idiot “therapists” telling them “oh the kids’ll be fine”

As someone who drafts the stupid “Parenting Plans” required by the law, let me tell you, there is no joy to moving the kids around between homes like checkers on a board. The kids want to be in ONE stable home and do stuff with BOTH parents at the same time and they do NOT want to hear how awful the other parent is every other weekend


7 posted on 02/13/2009 5:59:50 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Yes. They’ll be trying to wring a little more money out of the divorce/cohabitation/child snatching industry with more romanticism (including feminism). Young men and women, choose your mates very wisely. Take years to do it. It’s you, your spouses and your kids against the neighborhood busybodies and the government.


8 posted on 02/13/2009 5:59:54 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

I’m sorry, it’s a class unto itself. It, “...fill(s) a void between an emotionless biology of sex education and preachy abstinence lectures.”

There. That’s much better. Now my tax dollars are well spent to pay her salary because God Forbid our kids should actually learn Biology (you know, ‘Insert Tab A into Slot B and nine months later you’re a Mama!’), or have to put up with ‘preachy abstinence lectures.’ LOL!

In other words, a taxpayer funded ‘elective’ so students can just screw around and garner a few credits toward that oh-so-useful degree in Basket Weaving with a minor in World Peace. *Rolleyes*


9 posted on 02/13/2009 6:01:14 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Members of some families, BTW, do actively work to get to know members of other families in order break the other families. They do it to keep potential local business and job competition down. I’ve observed and analyzed those activities for several decades.


10 posted on 02/13/2009 6:03:32 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Here is another radical idea!

“”My focus on criminology led me to develop a keen focus on at-risk kids, adolescents and families,” Pearson said. “Sure there are other very important factors like economics, culture and community. But family breakdown also has a huge impact on kids.”


11 posted on 02/13/2009 6:06:20 PM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiKev

People have taken the people out of communication... They find it easier to hide behind a device to talk to others. They cannot communicate face to face.

That said, I think the secret to a healthy, long lasting relationship is easy. Just appreciate the other person, frequently communicate your appreciation, and remain willfully ignorant of their flaws.

Of course, being humans, we cannot effectively communicate wisdom nor truth to each other. Only experience can teach us. If we base our most significant relationship on the simple minded pursuit of quick pleasure (hooking up) without any basis in the substansive nature of what we truly need from a mate, then disaster (aka hilarity) will ensue.

Let the chips fall where they may. Let the MTV generation learn the hard way. They will understand when they try to pass along their (hard earned) wisdom to their children/grandchildren and fail. This is the human condition.


12 posted on 02/13/2009 6:09:13 PM PST by hnorris (Deserve Victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

what are you getting at familyop


13 posted on 02/13/2009 6:10:25 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hnorris

great recipe I like it


14 posted on 02/13/2009 6:11:50 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
""How much do people spend on a wedding and how much time do they spend planning it?" she asks the class. Students suggest $10,000 to $30,000 and loads of time. She responds, "What if people spent even a tiny fraction of that preparing for a marriage?"

Do that and you don't have that fancy photo album to look at as you grow old together.

15 posted on 02/13/2009 6:15:20 PM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I don’t know if you can get what I’m having where you are. Sleeman No. 20 Anniversary Ale. It’s a GREAT beer!

Somebody needs to teach these kids what to do...their parents sure aren’t.


16 posted on 02/13/2009 6:24:36 PM PST by AntiKev ("Within the strangest people, truth can find the strangest home." - Great Big Sea - Company of Fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
In other words, a taxpayer funded ‘elective’ so students can just screw around and garner a few credits toward that oh-so-useful degree in Basket Weaving with a minor in World Peace. *Rolleyes*

It seems that her ideas are very traditional. Dating instead of hooking up and teaching about how family problems hurt children, etc. I really believe that most young people are not prepared to find suitable mates and engage in a long, loving relationship of marriage. Maybe some that take her course will have better lives and maybe some will go on to teach how others may have better lives.

17 posted on 02/13/2009 6:30:40 PM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
"what are you getting at familyop"

I'll make it more clear. Shrews have always been known for oozing their way into the private matters of their neighbors, fomenting internal family discontent in order to break those families, and thus, destroy potential business and job competition. The variety of regulations and laws passed by congressmen in both political parties over the past few decades to start and fund anti-family social programs tend make such opportunism and illegitimate competition more easy and common for the shrews. One case in point is the VAWA and its anti-Second-Amendment law. It was sold to Congress by way of the usual feminist subjectivities, victimology and anecdotes.

Also, such social programs are a commonly known and unconstitutional waste of tax revenues. There's nothing conservative about unconstitutional taxes for supporting man-haters and family-haters (misogamists) from disfunctional families to break other families by way of deceits and instigations based on trivialities.

And no, I have no personal reason for noticing the effects of such social and government policies except for the unreasonable taxes, higher crime rates (fatherlessness), generally more rude public behaviors (fatherlessness), wrongful methods of enlarging and cheapening the labor pool (by breaking families) and so on.


18 posted on 02/13/2009 7:16:19 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; All

Anybody got a picture of this teacher? I’m trying to remember if I had a class with her. The name sounds familiar but I’m not sure.


19 posted on 02/13/2009 7:31:09 PM PST by Ellendra (Most eco-freaks wouldn't know nature if it bit them on the butt . . . and it often does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Anyone who calls herself “progressive” instead of “liberal” has her head so far up her *ss she can bite her kidneys.


20 posted on 02/13/2009 8:00:58 PM PST by Julia H. (Dissent is only the highest form of patriotism when Democrats are not in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson