Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pollywog

She alleges in her suit that “she witnessed the murder of her daughter” and said she “sustained severe emotional distress, shock and psychic trauma which have resulted in discernible bodily injury.”

The mother went for an abortion with the intent of killing her child, but the doctor failed to kill the child until after it was born and now the mother who wanted the child dead is suing because the child is dead? I’m confused.


8 posted on 02/07/2009 3:18:16 PM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: nobama08

She had an epiphany and foresaw the miraculous potential for a big lawsuit.


18 posted on 02/07/2009 3:56:11 PM PST by Irene Adler (Is it possible to be a socially conservative anarchist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson