Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: Reelection rests on stimulus
The Politico ^

Posted on 02/02/2009 8:31:24 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Obama: Reelection rests on stimulus By: Andy Barr February 2, 2009 10:35 AM EST

President Barack Obama acknowledged Monday that the fate of his reelection four years from now likely rests on the success of the proposed $825 billion stimulus package.

“A year from now, I think people are going to see that we’re starting to make some progress. But there’s still going to be some pain out there,” Obama predicted during an interview on NBC’s “Today Show.”

“If I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition.”

In acknowledging that his political fortune hinges on the state of the economy, Obama urged the country to be patient in waiting for the stimulus to take effect.

“I do have confidence that we’re going to be able to get it right. But it’s not going to be overnight,” he said. “There are no silver bullets to this. The fact of the matter is that we are suffering from a massive hangover from a binge of risk-taking.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 0bama; bho2009; bhostimulus; democrats; economy; obama; porkulus; stimulus; theone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: A. Morgan

“One and OUT, if he’s lucky enough not to be thrown OUT before the end of his term!”

My longshot prediction is that after BHO screws up a couple of international incidents, Hillary resigns as SoS and challenges him for the ‘12 nomination.


21 posted on 02/02/2009 8:45:27 AM PST by Buck W. (BHO: Selling hope, keeping the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Two weeks in office and this career politician is already talking “reelection”


22 posted on 02/02/2009 8:46:25 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Awful shallow thinking if that’s what he thinks.

His alleged reelection depends on much more that the economy.

He bloody well better have done away with illegal immigration, reduced the size and scope of government and cleaned up Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah any other weirdo who want to kill us.


23 posted on 02/02/2009 8:47:32 AM PST by WorkerbeeCitizen (The only time I want a Republican reaching across the aisle is to smack a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Geez. NBC really is his personal network.


24 posted on 02/02/2009 8:47:41 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The little drug addled cocaine sniffing community organizer is already throwing in the towel.


25 posted on 02/02/2009 8:47:55 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama: Reelection rests on stimulus....

Disagree——reelections depends on two items:

1) how long the media can blame and convince the sheeple that GW Bush and wall street are to blame for economic bad news

2) how long the media/Obama honeymoon lasts


26 posted on 02/02/2009 8:48:38 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
.....because,after all,it IS all about him.
He's saying "Screw the country,I wanna keep my power!"
27 posted on 02/02/2009 8:49:34 AM PST by gimme1ibertee ("No pale pastels,but bold colors".....Ronnie,we sure do miss you,sir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

duh.

Why else is obama going straight to the CLASS WARFARE HANDBOOK.

They can’t tell the truth and blame congress for FORCING the bad home loans (barney frank, chriss dodd, maxine waters) so they have to attack (gasp!) RICH PEOPLE FOR BEING SUCCESSFUL!!!!!

(s)How dare they earn money! more than minimum wage!!(/s)


28 posted on 02/02/2009 8:50:08 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Just DAMN......


29 posted on 02/02/2009 8:57:51 AM PST by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Claire “the idiot” McCaskell wants the “One” to be the standardbearer for wages.
Sounds like the ‘Basic Income Guarantee’ plan from the Marxists raising it’s ugly head.


30 posted on 02/02/2009 8:59:25 AM PST by griswold3 (a good story is more compelling than the search for truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid
Don’t you worry about reelection. It ain’t going to happen.

I am worried about him wanting a third term.

31 posted on 02/02/2009 9:00:05 AM PST by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.

This may seem like a stupid question, but what are all of these advisors and cabinet members for, I understand that the big majority of them are a bunch of libs, but yet some of them have got to have some type of a brain


32 posted on 02/02/2009 9:04:26 AM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The kindest thing to do with Oba Mao would be to build him a fake White House on a Hollywood set and let him and his adolescent minions pretend to be important. Then they could have an “American Idol” style competition every four years so the sheeple could text or call in their votes.
33 posted on 02/02/2009 9:06:22 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Republican Amendment should be:

"Congress declares a National Dividend in the amount of $9,000 per taxpayer instead of Porkulus."

34 posted on 02/02/2009 9:07:05 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Congress declares a National Dividend in the amount of $9,000 per taxpayer instead of Porkulus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

Two weeks in office and this career politician is already talking “reelection”

______________________________________________

I’ll have to find Zero’s quote.....but he said the same thing a week ago while meeting with the GOP.


35 posted on 02/02/2009 9:12:17 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Obama dozed.....people froze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

ONE AND DONE


36 posted on 02/02/2009 9:17:16 AM PST by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3; All
I just got an annoying robo-call from a lady who did not identify herself, but sounded like that brown-noser McCaskill wanting me to call Sen. Bond (my other Sen.) and urge him to vote for Pres. Obama’s economic plan, and offered to connect me to Sen. Bond's office at no charge to do so. I pressed “1” to connect and told the girl who answered to tell Sen. Bond to vote AGAINST the plan. Seems like these butt-kissers are spending a lot of our taxes trying to pass something that will cost an awful lot more (in taxes, lost freedoms, etc.).
37 posted on 02/02/2009 9:18:01 AM PST by Southbound ("A liar in public life is worse than a full-paid-up Communist, and I don't care who he is." - HST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So getting re-elected is job one for this doofus?That just fills me with confidence.


38 posted on 02/02/2009 9:23:53 AM PST by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southbound

I guess president zero can’t rely on foreign contributions for his reelection campaign so he is forced to steal from our treasury in order to buy votes.

Rot in he**, you commie!!


39 posted on 02/02/2009 9:24:00 AM PST by american_ranger (Never ever use DirecTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid
Don’t you worry about reelection. It ain’t going to happen.

Especially if he gets impeached.

40 posted on 02/02/2009 9:25:26 AM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson