To: FlingWingFlyer
NOW GIVE THEM THEIR DAMN JOBS BACK!!!! Uh, no. I think it's fine to let them off with time served, but their coverup of the shooting shows that they shouldn't be trusted with that job again.
57 posted on
01/19/2009 10:18:53 AM PST by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Ramius
Coverup? How? Their supervisor picked up the shell casings at the site of the shooting incident. GIVE THEM THEIR DAMN JOBS BACK! Anyone who shoots a drug smuggler in the ass is doing it right.
60 posted on
01/19/2009 10:23:01 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(CIA Director!....So easy, a caveman can do it!)
To: Ramius
True - the fleeing drug smuggler was not a threat to them and shooting him was not within the allowed forms of engagement for that particular set of circumstances - which is precisely why they chose to not correctly document the event. The first act may well have been dismissed as error, but the second act is a crime, and it is just that they remain convicted.
All of that being said, I wouldn't have objected to a jury pardon in their case, given only what I know about it.
76 posted on
01/19/2009 6:52:04 PM PST by
Clinging Bitterly
(Posting from an undisclosed location in the Nation of Bitter Clingers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson