calenel said: "Not a credible source."
wndawmn666 said: "Oh, I get it. FactCheck is only credible when they say Obama’s birth certificate it legit. When they admit he was a British citizen at birth they are not credible. Makes perfect sense."
calenel said: "Before you accuse people of bias or inconsistency you should actually check what they said....I question their (FactCheck) objectivity and integrity since they are 'owned' by the same organization that 'owns' Obama, namely Annenberg."
wndawmn666 said: "I never accused YOU of anything. Perhaps you should take your own advice?"
Well, I apologize if I misunderstood your intent, but perhaps you can see how I might have drawn the conclusion that you were accusing me of inconsistency and/or bias. I haven't cited FactCheck that I can remember, whether to support or refute an argument, so being critical of them is not inconsistent, and I think that the relationship between and among Annenberg, Obama, FactCheck (and Ayers) allows for a reasonable doubt as to the credibility and integrity of FactCheck. Again, I apologize for any unfair accusations I might have made.
Thank you, calenel. Yes, I can see how my comment came off that way and I apologize for not being clearer.