Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

“There is a great deal of difference. Only a Natural Born Citizen can become President. For that, you have to be born on US soil, to two US parents.”

I don’t know about the two parents part. I always thought being born on U.S. soil was enough. I mean, children born on U.S. soil are citizens, right? And if they’re citizens at the time they’re born, I’m pretty sure that means they’re natural born citizens.


374 posted on 12/04/2008 2:15:56 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane
I don’t know about the two parents part. I always thought being born on U.S. soil was enough. I mean, children born on U.S. soil are citizens, right? And if they’re citizens at the time they’re born, I’m pretty sure that means they’re natural born citizens.

I understand. We're all troubled by the lack of clarity about US definitions (or lack thereof) regarding the exact classifications of US citizenship.

It's my opinion that the case of Barack Obama has brought this festering murkiness to the surface, and now it will have to be fully confronted and defined by the US Supreme Court.

It's my guess that they will consult The Federalist Papers, Black's Commentaries, and other historical writings to determine the intentions of the Framers for using that exact phrase, and what they meant by it.

514 posted on 12/04/2008 6:51:44 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson