To: John Valentine; kabar
NO case heard in the Supreme Court has EVER held that birthright citizenship is granted under the 14th Amendment to the children of people in the United States illegally. Or legally, for that matter, if not admitted as immigrants. Good Point!!!!
200 posted on
12/04/2008 6:55:48 AM PST by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Uncle Chip
True enough, but there are millions of American citizens who obtained their citizenship thru birthright citizenship and hold American passports. IMO, the only way we can change our current laws and practice on birthright citizenship is thru a Consitutional amendment.
Anchor babies: the Irish got it right
201 posted on
12/04/2008 6:59:15 AM PST by
kabar
To: Uncle Chip
>>> NO case heard in the Supreme Court has EVER held that birthright citizenship is granted under the 14th Amendment to the children of people in the United States illegally. Or legally, for that matter, if not admitted as immigrants
Yes, and by the same token, the SCOTUS has never "ruled" on the term "Natural Born Citizen" in context to the COTUS and it's requirements of the President.
If it's "not a problem," why is it that Andrew Jackson was the last President who had a parent born out of the US, back in 1837? More than 150 years ago?
Just a coincidence? Yeah, right...
206 posted on
12/04/2008 7:04:27 AM PST by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson