Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

Did anyone bother to tell this RINO nitwit that 3 more states outlawed same-sex marriage fraud? Even in ultra-liberal California it was overturned. Seems no matter where the people get to vote on this issue, it is overturned. Too bad the fascists of Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Vermont won’t give the people a chance to speak their minds at the polls.

It seems whenever the party embraces the RINO philosophy we LOSE voters. It would appear that folks having the choice to vote for two shades of the same liberal flavor would prefer to stay home. Take note: whenever McCain moved to the right his poll numbers went up. Whenever he reverted back to his RINO status (suggesting putting Al Gore at EPA, jumping on the Socialist bailout, proposing even another $300 billion for home buyouts, etc.), McCain tanked in the polls.

Ms. Whitman - please do us a favor: come out of your liberal closet and go join the other RINOs and Democrats. You couldn’t get more RINO than McCain and it showed what an absolute mistake the party made. The liberal MSM baited the Republicans with their love for McCain only to demonize him after he was the nominee. Never again!!!


40 posted on 11/16/2008 12:10:12 PM PST by datakcy (Declaring our love for God, country, and family ISN'T hate speech - it's common sense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: datakcy
The liberal MSM baited the Republicans with their love for McCain only to demonize him after he was the nominee. Never again!!!

We say every "never again" every time we nominate a RINO who was picked by the media, and then we fall for that ruse again the next time.

We conservative Repubs don't nominate a conservative because we allow the media to convince us that we must VOTE FOR RINOS IN THE PRIMARIES BECAUSE A CONSERVATIVE CAN'T WIN. Not one of the 3 or 4 leading candidates in this year's Repub primaries was a conservative, so how did that happen if conservatives are the majority of the party as I believe we still are? IMHO it happened because we conservatives listened to the media and believed that the only Repubs who could win in November were liberal/moderate RINOs like Giuliani, Romney, McCain, Huckabee, etc. Does anyone on this thread think that Hunter or any other real conservative nominee would have refused to attack Obama on his radical far left voting record, his collaboration with known traitors and communists like Ayers and Alinsky, and his extremely questionable financial dealings with unindicted criminals like Rezko and others of his ilk? Or would he have refused to attack Obama for lying about sitting under his pastor Wright's racist diatribes for 20 years without ever once noticing the hateful anti-whitey, anti-Semitic garbage that Wright was constantly spewing in every "sermon"?

Bottom line, if we want a conservative nominee who will relentlessly attack the Dem nominee everywhere that he or she is vulnerable we have to stop allowing the media to pick our nominee, and SUPPORT A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE IN THE PRIMARY WITH OUR MONEY AND OUR VOTES!

Sorry for all the shouting. I just get bitterly frustrated when I think about how easily we get rolled by the Dems and their media lapdogs over and over again without ever learning anything from our losses.

89 posted on 11/16/2008 8:45:16 PM PST by epow (I'll keep my God, my freedom, my guns, and my money. You can keep THE CHANGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson