Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Jamie Gorelick Won’t Get To Be AG
cashill.com ^ | 11/13/2008 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 11/13/2008 8:37:28 PM PST by Sioux-san

This week in its series, “The New Team,” The New York Times profiles Jamie Gorelick, (pronounced Guh-REH-lick), very possibly America’s next attorney general.

In the way of “baggage,” reporter Eric Lichtblau cites her past employment as vice chairwoman at Fannie Mae and her role in creating the famed intelligence “wall” while deputy attorney general under Clinton.

Lichtblau may not be aware, however, of her most significant contribution to American security, or lack of the same, the one that put her in position to earn what the Times reports as “$25.6 million in salary and other compensation from 1998 to 2003” at Fannie Mae.

Nor does Lichtblau suggest that something other than patriotism may well have inspired her to leave her lucrative post at Fannie Mae to sign on as one of only five Democrats on the 9/11 commission.

In the way of background, Gorelick assumed the deputy AG position in 1994 a month after Clinton crony Webster Hubbell resigned from the Justice Department in disgrace.

Like Hubbell, Gorelick served as the “political officer” in the 100-thousand employee department, the eyes and ears of the administration, the one who could be trusted. Her boss, Janet Reno, an unreliable figurehead, could not.

An article in the June 3, 1996, Newsweek, described, for instance, how Gorelick had set up a “campaign-like war room” in her office because “in a campaign year, Justice can't afford to be totally blind.”

Six weeks later, on July 17, 1996 –two days before the start of the Atlanta Olympics –TWA Flight 800 blew up off the south coast of Long Island, killing all 230 people on board.

(Excerpt) Read more at cashill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho2008; bhoag; gorelick; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Sioux-san

Janet is not far behind in spending programs. After the Bush tax cuts, We had a 2 bil. surplus 2 years ago when she ran for re-election and now we have nearly a 2 bil. deficit.


21 posted on 11/14/2008 3:20:20 PM PST by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AzNASCARfan

I am starting to get really paranoid. All of this craziness (federal & state govt’s gone wild) seems rather intentional - gotta bring her all down so that America can be rebuilt into the new USSA - United Socialists States of America. Then I’d have to move somewhere that would actually want to secede. It sure won’t be welfare Michigan.


22 posted on 11/14/2008 3:28:30 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
The Democrats don’t really believe in the War on Terror—they think it’s just a con game by the Bush administration to accumulate power.

That's what they've wanted us to believe since 9/11.

However, if they need a "Remember The Maine!" moment, Obama's New Government Media will haul out footage of the Twin Towers jumpers faster than you can say spit.

You'll see the fireballs and hear the recorded screams more times than you can count, if they need us to dance like puppets on a string. Mark my words.

This is possible because the Republicans can no longer gain any political advantage from 9/11.

They showed us this in the two months after Palin was named as VP hopeful.

9/11 was suppressed, and our soldiers and Iraqi citizens were killed for the Democrats to gain political power. They're that insane, and they used their media to make it happen.

Our 401Ks were also dancing to their tune after the market implosion. What else explains Paulson's actions this week?

"Gosh, those emergency billions upon billions that we needed to do that one REALLY REALLY important thing just before the election? Well, we still need them, but not for that thing that was important just before the election."

23 posted on 11/14/2008 6:52:08 PM PST by an amused spectator (I am Joe, too - I'm talkin' to you, VBM: The Volkischer Beobachter Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
The Democrats don’t really believe in the War on Terror—they think it’s just a con game by the Bush administration to accumulate power.

BTW, I forgot to mention that you're right with this observation - the Democrats think this because THAT'S what they would have done...

24 posted on 11/14/2008 6:54:08 PM PST by an amused spectator (I am Joe, too - I'm talkin' to you, VBM: The Volkischer Beobachter Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson