Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RatsDawg
That's interesting, the Judge sent it out at 18:09 (6:09PM for those in Rio Linda) Berg Sent it out at 9:04 PM, almost 3 hours later.

Somebody's date/time stamp says 4:55 PM. Wonder who's that might be? It might be a "received" stamp rather than a sent stamp. Don't know if those go on the bottom on some or all machines or not.

64 posted on 10/25/2008 10:36:23 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
-- Somebody's date/time stamp says 4:55 PM. Wonder who's that might be? It might be a "received" stamp rather than a sent stamp. --

Entirely different font, the zeros have no slash. That 04:55 indication at the bottom of the page may come from whatever word-processor/printer the judge used, then taking that and faxing it to the Courthouse, and then the Courthouse faxing it to parties. FAX-impressed timestamps appear right side up when they are at the top of the page. I've never seen otherwise.

Even if this was written by somebody in the Obama camp (unlikely to be true, as in being the direct author, but not unlikely for a judge to lift passages from argument - PACER has no links to any of the briefs, so I can't compare argument with Opinion), Judge Surrick has issued language under his signature.

I haven't read it yet, but I've found that attacks on the arguments themselves, and it's fine to ascribe positions to one party or the other, work best.

70 posted on 10/26/2008 4:56:03 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson