Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lonestar67
You're right about the glasses, but the whole interview was insulting.

The sophomoric overuse of “in” intellectual terms from the 1960’s was dreadful. I felt embarrassed for Charlie.

It was reminiscent of Gore sighing during the debates with Bush. Rather than looking intellectual, he looked like a pompous ass. It was the same with Charlie.

61 posted on 09/11/2008 8:52:59 PM PDT by GOPJ (Biden and Obama voted for the "bridge to No-Where". Why doesn't the MSM care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ

Agreed.

It was journalistic pomposity.


72 posted on 09/11/2008 9:01:48 PM PDT by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson