Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Allan

1. You say that a BL-4 is necessary to maintain the purity of the culture. What do you make of the subtilus contamination of the attack anthrax?

2. Who had BL-4s in September 2001?

3. Let’s see. You’ve never weaponized anthrax and the experts with whom I’ve consulted on the subject for 7 years have weaponized anthrax and simulants for a living. My consulting scientist is head of a lab that made simulant that matching parameters (to include, for example, images I’ve shown TrebleRebel. You not only have never made anthrax simulant (as best I know) but have never forwarded SEMS. I think it is you who is not abiding by any sort of scientific approach.

But let’s start with the easy question. Who had BL-4s and where were they located? Not Battelle, Ohio? Battelle at Dugway? And under my theory it involves the Battelle consultants, chief DIA biothreat person, a former USAMRIID commander with access to the keys to the kingdom, and an infiltrator who is working to destroy Western Civilization — even PhD theses relating to theft of equipment, access, infiltration. Your theory,... your theory... I don’t know that you’ve ever stated it. But by all means, start with the easy question of identifying the location of the BL-4 labs and explaining the subtilus contamination.


172 posted on 08/14/2008 2:39:25 PM PDT by ZACKandPOOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: Allan

What do you make of the MSNBC report that the isotope ratios indicate that the culture was grown in the Northeastern United States? (the map in the actual studies actually would seem to include the adjacent parts of Canada).

Does Suffield have a BL-4?


173 posted on 08/14/2008 2:50:03 PM PDT by ZACKandPOOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson