For me, it is also a deal breaker. Anyone who can't pass muster with CFG is not a viable candidate.
Only two tests remain for me to declare Eric Cantor a great choice:
Well he seems to be on his way, the dems are already hitting him...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2057376/posts
Here is how they describe themselves:
Club for Growth is a national network of thousands of Americans, from all walks of life, who believe that prosperity and opportunity come through economic freedom. We work to promote public policies that promote economic growth primarily through legislative involvement, issue advocacy, research, training and educational activity.
The primary tactic of the separate Club for Growth PAC is to provide financial support from Club members to viable pro-growth candidates to Congress, particularly in Republican primaries.
Club for Growth Policy Goals:
Making the Bush tax cuts permanent
Death tax repeal
Cutting and limiting government spending
Social Security reform with personal retirement accounts
Expanding free trade
Legal reform to end abusive lawsuits
Replacing the current tax code
School choice
Regulatory reform and deregulation
Scores 0% by NARAL on pro-choice voting record, but rated 100% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance.
Rated 0% by the HRC, indicating an anti-gay-rights stance.
Rated A by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record.
Rated 17% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes.
Rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a voting record restricting immigration.
Rated 0% by SANE, indicating a pro-military voting record.
Based on the above scores, he was rated as a "Hard-Core Conservative."
Sounds good to me.