Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Golf TDI Diesel-Electric Hybrid Concept: 69 MPG US
www.greencarcongress.com ^ | 03/05/2008 | Staff

Posted on 03/05/2008 10:45:17 AM PST by Red Badger

The Golf TDI Hybrid concept (earlier post) introduced by Volkswagen at the Geneva Motor Show combines an advanced diesel engine with an electric motor and the latest generation of VW’s seven-speed DSG gearbox. The hybrid concept vehicle is capable of achieving 3.4 L/100km (69 mpg US) of fuel consumption.

At the core of the new Golf TDI Hybrid is a 1.2-liter three-cylinder common rail TDI diesel engine developing 55 kW (74 hp) and 179 Nm (132 lb-ft) of torque. Working either in tandem with the diesel engine or, if required, on its own in all-electric mode, is an electric motor developing 20 kW and 140 Nm (103 lb-ft) of torque. The electric motor also replaces the conventional starter motor and alternator to save weight and improve packaging.

The motor can also operate as a generator, recovering kinetic energy from the car during braking to charge the 220 volt, 45 kg nickel metal hydride battery which has a capacity of 1.4 kWh.

In practice the electric motor powers the vehicle from standstill with the diesel engine only engaging should additional acceleration be required or at higher speeds. In these situations the diesel engine takes over with the electric motor only working if required to supplement the combustion engine – for example, during overtaking manoeuvres. When at a standstill the diesel engine shuts down completely to conserve fuel and increase efficiency. The energy split is relayed to the driver and passengers through a graphic display accessed through the touchscreen satellite navigation screen.

Drive on the concept car is channeled through the new seven-speed DSG twin-clutch gearbox. This features a pair of dry clutches as opposed to wet clutches.

Visual changes which differentiate the Golf TDI Hybrid include a new, unique grille design, smaller front air intakes to reduce aerodynamic drag and ‘TDI-Hybrid’ badging. The Golf TDI Hybrid also sits lower than the standard Golf on revised suspension and adopts the front splitter from the Golf GTI Edition 30 to help further reduce aerodynamic drag.

The Golf TDI Hybrid is currently a concept vehicle, but Volkswagen says that a version of this vehicle is likely to go into production in the future.

This study follows the recent launch of the efficient new Golf BlueMotion. Adopting an optimized 1.9-liter, four-cylinder diesel engine linked to a revised gearbox and more efficient aerodynamics the Golf BlueMotion can achieve a combined 4.5 L/100km (52.3 mpg US) while emitting just 119 g/km of CO2.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: auto; automakers; diesel; energy; fuel; hybrids
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: doug from upland

I check that site, too from time to time. Thanks!..........


41 posted on 03/05/2008 11:15:44 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Designer

They do....The H2 will be coming out in diesel sometime within the next two years.....looking forward to that...


42 posted on 03/05/2008 11:16:28 AM PST by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhJlseAY0E0


43 posted on 03/05/2008 11:17:55 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Why not leave out the large battery, and just use the diesel running at some optimal rpm to generate power for the electric? Like a locomotive does, or some ships?

Seems like it ought to work.

Because the purpose of the diesel electric system on a locomotive is not economy.

44 posted on 03/05/2008 11:18:42 AM PST by DungeonMaster (WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK, AND I USE IT TOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
diesel in them days was not the super-refined sulfur- nicotine- and cholesterol-free fuel demanded by the green butthole bureaucraps of today

That's true, but you and I both know that even with new rules on content, it still doesn't account for the price increase!

But it was cheap, especially if you could buy 1000 gals at a time and weren't super-patriotic about road taxes and knew a little about dyes

Hmmm....sounds like somebody here was an independent adept at running the weigh stations....

I had a Mercedes 220D back then. Glow plug starter. Sold it to some guy in Newport Beach who had an offshore diving bell company. Right after I sold it, the prices went up! (sold in March of '79). But he kept it, ran for I don't know how long.

And you're right, on a cold morning it belched blackness.

45 posted on 03/05/2008 11:29:10 AM PST by Regulator (We Are Sooooooo Screwed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I wonder if it breaks down like modern VW’s have a tendency to do. Truth is, for reliability, you’d be better off with GM, to say nothing of Toyota, Honda, or Nissan. At least with GM vehicles if they do break down the parts don’t cost nearly so much.


46 posted on 03/05/2008 11:29:21 AM PST by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Heck, even a gas powered Civic gets 35-40 mpg on the highway

Heck, my 1994 Civic 4 door/5 speed got 37mpg city, 43mpg highway regularly.
47 posted on 03/05/2008 11:41:06 AM PST by copaliscrossing (If stupidity were barrels of oil, we should start drilling the liberals heads right now!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Where are the cars that get 69mpg on premium gas?


48 posted on 03/05/2008 11:41:28 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

“charge the 220 volt battery
Seems like if you get into an accident, someone could get fried. Ouch!”

I know, why don’t they just stick to those nice safe tanks of gasoline, they never cause any problems.


49 posted on 03/05/2008 12:00:12 PM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Even though the price of diesel is higher than gasoline, it’s STILL MORE ECONOMICAL. Do the math............

Better find out the price premium for the diesel hybrid first.

Diesels are an economical choice for passenger cars in Europe because the price of fuel is considerably higher there. However, you would need to drive an awful lot of miles for them to be economical here.

Hybrids aren't really economical here, though as their batteries get to have a longer life cycle and gasoline prices increase, they may become economical.

However, combining the higher price of a diesel motor and the higher price of a hybrid doesn't sound like an economical winner.

Gasoline motors also tend to be lower in efficiency at low RPMs, and the electric motor has good low end torque, so they compliment each other well. That's the reason I was told that we haven't seen diesel hybrids before now.

VW may have found a way to make an extremely efficient diesel hybrid, or they may have just found an expensive way of having the highest MPG in their class which will likely sell to some people despite it not being cost effective.

50 posted on 03/05/2008 12:03:08 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
"After a record-setting 1979, the 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would succumb to an oncoming recession and continuing fuel crisis. Only 152,005 Camaros were sold, with a larger percentage (over a third at 51,104) opting for the more fuel-efficient V6.

The base engine was a 229-ci V6 rated at 115 horsepower, while the California version was a 231-ci rated at 110 horsepower. The Z28 brought its buyers the power they sought: a 350-ci V8 rated at 190 horsepower. It was also given a new look, with an intimidating grill sporting the Z28 emblem."

Which one do you think is faster, a 4000lb 190hp Camaro or this VW?

51 posted on 03/05/2008 12:04:40 PM PST by gura (It's 3am and something is wrong in the world, who would want answering the phone? John McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
"Hybrids aren't really economical here,"

America is a big country; hybrids make sense for some, but not for others.

52 posted on 03/05/2008 12:08:32 PM PST by gura (It's 3am and something is wrong in the world, who would want answering the phone? John McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
OK, I give up! :^) Math was never my strong suit.

Carolyn

53 posted on 03/05/2008 12:08:34 PM PST by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I would like to see the vehicle performance in hot and cold weather. My 2008 Mariner Hybrid (gas) gives great results in mild weather when the engine isn't required to provide heat or drive the air conditioner compressor. Once the weather migrates out of the range where the engine can remain off, the economy goes right down the tubes. My Mariner has does as well as 32 MPH in mild weather. This winter, the mileage dropped to 21.9 MPG. We are currently running at 25.7 MPG as the weather has moderated.
54 posted on 03/05/2008 12:13:20 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just for reference:

$3/gallon gas
@ 30 mpg = $0.10/mile (Corvette, Mercedes E320)
@ 60 mpg = $0.20/mile (Lucky to achieve.)

10,000 miles per year. $1000 annual difference in fuel cost.
Which about offsets the cost to replace the batteries after a period of years.


55 posted on 03/05/2008 12:14:40 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Guns don’t kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Diesel formulation standards have changed in the last couple years. The sulfur content has been dropped significantly. That requires extra processing at the refinery. It also requires new lubricants in the diesel engines to compensate for the loss of lubricity that the previous sulfur content provided.

Our new lower sulfur fuel is satisfactory for sale in Europe, thus creating a competing market for our fuel supply. The European fuel has sulfur levels higher than we permit, thus their fuel supply isn't impacted by demand from U.S. based consumers.

56 posted on 03/05/2008 12:18:34 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CDHart

Just talking money, instead of “math”. The initial purchase of a diesel engine automobile is higher, for various reasons. But one of those reasons is the materials that a diesel engine is made of. Because of their higher compression than gasoline engines and more power transmitted to the wheels at low RPMs, the diesels are made of much tougher materials. And, as a result they last longer than gasoline engines. So you get more miles per $$$ spent on the engine and better fuel economy, too. The GM fiasco of the 1980’s with their gasoline-converted diesel engines left many people with a bad taste for diesel engines. That bad experience is fading away, slowly, as a new generation of drivers comes on the scene. Already, in Europe, 53% OF ALL NEW AUTOMOBILES SOLD ARE DIESELS! We are waaaaay behind, for many reasons, the GM fiasco just being one of them. Enviro-whackos and ETHANOL MADNESS are two big reasons................


57 posted on 03/05/2008 12:20:20 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gura
America is a big country; hybrids make sense for some, but not for others.

If you buy a diesel and drive a lot of miles, you will eventually see savings due to using fuel despite the higher price up front.

With hybrids you pay the higher price up front, but you also have the high costs of replacing the battery if you drive the vehicle a lot of miles. Last I read, when the costs of replacing the battery were included you didn't end up saving money even if you drove a lot.

However, the price of gasoline has been going up, and they have been improving the batteries, so that may have changed by now or in the not so distant future.

For some people there are other benefits to owning a hybrid. I have a friend with a Mercury Mariner Hybrid that loves it not just because of the fuel mileage, but because it doubles as a generator when tailgating or campground camping.

For some people it is worth the extra expense to produce less emissions and direct less money toward the oil industry.

Different people have different priorities.

58 posted on 03/05/2008 12:21:41 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RC2
The price of diesel is higher

Rip off is an incorrect expression when only applied to diesel fuel. If diesel fuel prices are a rip off then all fuel derived from crude oil is a rip off. Diesel fuel is basically the cost of home heating oil with the highway taxes added. Of course home heating oil is delivered to the address where it is consumed while diesel is delivered to a distribution center.

Refineries' must produce home heating oil and several blends of gasoline in anticipation of the demand. A 42 gallon barrel of crude oil yields approximately nine gallons of distillate fuel oil, approximately four gallons of jet fuel, and approximately 20 gallons of gasoline.

59 posted on 03/05/2008 12:28:41 PM PST by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

Your 60 mpg example should be a cost of $.05/mile. But your answer is correct. I’d give you 1/2 credit. ;^)


60 posted on 03/05/2008 12:32:43 PM PST by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson