Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China irate as US shoots down satellite
FT ^ | 02/21/08 | Demetri Sevastopulo

Posted on 02/21/2008 9:30:23 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

China irate as US shoots down satellite

By Demetri Sevastopulo in Honolulu

Published: February 21 2008 18:28 | Last updated: February 22 2008 00:21

The US navy destroyed a decaying spy satellite that was falling to earth with potentially hazardous fuel on Thursday, prompting accusations of double standards from China.

On Wednesday afternoon in the northwest Pacific, an Aegis warship fired a missile that intercepted the satellite 247km up in space. The USS Lake Erie launched the missile shortly after Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, arrived in Hawaii en route to Australia.

Mr Gates said the operation appeared to be “very successful”. The navy was attempting both to hit the satellite before it entered the atmosphere and to destroy the fuel tank, which the Pentagon said posed a hazard to humans.

General James Cartwright, vice-chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the military had “a high degree of confidence that we got the tank” but cautioned that it would take another two days to make a final confirmation.

Earlier, a Chinese Communist party newspaper had accused the US of double standards. Washington criticised other nations for their space ambitions, while itself trying to win a military advantage in space, the overseas edition of the People’s Daily newspaper said.

Mr Gates stressed that there had been “complete transparency” surrounding the US operation. China has asked the US to proviide data about the operation. Mr Gates said the US was prepared to share where “appropriate”.

The national reconnaissance agency launched the spy satellite in December 2006. But the military lost control of it shortly after it reached orbit, when the onboard communications systems went dead. Last month the US informed other countries that the decaying satellite was falling to earth. President George W. Bush ordered the destruction of the satellite, which was carrying a toxic fuel called hydrazine.

The Pentagon has rejected suggestions it was using the failed satellite as a pretext to conduct an anti-satellite weapons test. Last year the US criticised China for conducting an anti-satellite test, destroying an ageing weather satellite in space without providing advance notice. Both tests created debris in space, which experts warned could pose a threat to other satellites.

On Wednesday night in Hawaii, Admiral Timothy Keating, the head of US Pacific command, said the US had acted responsibly by informing other countries in advance. Speaking shortly before the navy took the shot, he added that “no one has expressed concern”.

Gen Cartwright said debris from the destroyed satellite had started falling into the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. The Pentagon on Wednesday said all the debris would re-enter the atmosphere within the next 40 days. Gen Cartwright played down suggestions the US had destroyed the satellite partly to stop other countries obtaining sensitive information about its spy satellites.

Ike Skelton, the Democratic chairman of the House of Representatives armed services committee, welcomed the successful strike but stressed that it was an “exceptional case”.

“We abandoned the pursuit of anti-satellite technology two decades ago due to concerns about the consequences of its use, and our country has no plans to renew those efforts,” he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; md; redchina; satellite; shootdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: afortiori

“monkey slap”

Wouldn’t that make the US the monkey?


21 posted on 02/21/2008 9:48:41 PM PST by fremont_steve (Milpitas - a great place to be FROM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China did this first, just as a show.

We did it to ostensibly keep a hazard from hurting others, while protecting our technology.

Screw China.


22 posted on 02/21/2008 9:51:13 PM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fremont_steve

How do you say “Bite Me” in Chinese?


23 posted on 02/21/2008 9:51:37 PM PST by Island Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

The debris from the Chinese satellite was in a much higher altitude. Every space faring nation will have to deal with it for many more years to come. The debris field from our satellite test was in a much lower orbit, and it should all be gone (reentered the atmosphere) in a few days.


24 posted on 02/21/2008 9:53:52 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
US 193 debris will *all* burn up in our atmosphere in the next 4 days or so.

In contrast, the debris from the Sino satellite shootdown will remain in orbit for a century or more.

25 posted on 02/21/2008 9:55:33 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Hey Chicoms: Better put some ice on that.


26 posted on 02/21/2008 9:57:06 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Alright, just to be fair, we can shoot down one of their satellites.


27 posted on 02/21/2008 9:58:30 PM PST by SmithL (My tagline dropped out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

If I heard the General correctly this morning, he said that they were showing the “low quality feed” of the missile impact...and they they were reviewing the “high quality feed” to identify if the fuel tank was indeed destroyed.

I was pretty impressed with the low quality feed footage


28 posted on 02/21/2008 9:59:30 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

OK, China. How about if next time, we just drop 1000 pounds of hydrazine on Beijing?


29 posted on 02/21/2008 9:59:38 PM PST by Cymbaline (I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
An oldie, but goodie:


30 posted on 02/21/2008 10:00:04 PM PST by SmithL (My tagline dropped out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

LOL.


31 posted on 02/21/2008 10:01:06 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Southack

China is upset because we didn’t have to brag about it, we just had a job to do and we did it.


32 posted on 02/21/2008 10:01:46 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cymbaline
express delivery of export item?
33 posted on 02/21/2008 10:02:06 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

No doubt Nancy Pelosi is greatly upset.


34 posted on 02/21/2008 10:02:11 PM PST by Hugin (Mecca delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

why on earth are we holding an olympics in a communist country which murdered many peaceful democracy protesters in tinnamen square?


35 posted on 02/21/2008 10:05:16 PM PST by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

That’s what I figured, and I wondered if it might invalidate the idea that this was a anti-satellite test because it wasn’t in a realistic enough orbit to be considered a valid target.


36 posted on 02/21/2008 10:08:01 PM PST by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Suck it up china, we’re not interested in your ire and even less interested in your poisoned products.

Grow the frack up and stop whining when you get beaten at a dirty game you started.

37 posted on 02/21/2008 10:10:27 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This is another little piece of genius where Bush accomplishes three items at once. First he destroys a satellite that has the potential to cause harm. Secondly he uses our military has the tools to protect us from outside threat. Finally he proved that not only do we have the technology, but our military is deadly accurate

Our enemies had better take notice of this little exercise. If they try to attack the U.S. they may end up having it backfire, thus causing harm to themselves instead of to us.

38 posted on 02/21/2008 10:12:32 PM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked (Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and get the U.N. out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
Hail the pioneers which made this possible:

Ronald Reagan and Edward Teller


39 posted on 02/21/2008 10:16:34 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
They would love to have the ability and would use it at the first opportunity.Remember treaties are only to disarm and weaken the U.S. so it will be easier to defeat the U.S.The only way to bring peace to the world is to hamstring the U.S. military and force the U.S. to get U.N. and E.U. permission before defending it's vital national interest!
40 posted on 02/21/2008 10:16:56 PM PST by bonehead4freedom (I haven't left the Republicans ,they have left me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson