Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney "Disses" Amateur Radio In Televised Town Meeting (and why he won't get my vote)
Eastern MA American Radio Relay League ^ | Wednesday 16 November 2005 @ 15:48:10 | Eastern Massachusetts ARRL

Posted on 01/10/2008 11:30:21 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson

Romney "Disses" Amateur Radio In Televised Town Meeting Posted on Wednesday 16 November 2005 @ 15:48:10

Governor Mitt Romney dismissed the role of Amateur Radio operators in emergency communications during a televised "town meeting" program last night on WCVB's "When Disaster Strikes: Segment Two." The program featured public safety and volunteer organization officials from across Massachusetts among its audience.

Host and moderator Natalie Jacobson asked an increasingly-agitated Governor Romney questions about communications interoperability, and communication without commercial power. Romney was next asked by Jacobson, "...so does it come down to ham radio?..."

The Governor replied in a disgusted tone, "No, we don't need to deal with ham radio operators..."

Embarrassed public safety officials later tried to put in a good word for Amateur Radio. National Weather Service Warning Coordination Meteorologist Glenn Field was prepared to state the importance of Amateur Radio, when Salvation Army Colonel Fred Van Brunt was called upon. Van Brunt remarked about his organization's quest to improve its communications capabilities and how Amateur Radio has aided his organization. "The ham radio situation helps a great deal," he stated.

"I have already written and submitted a letter to the Governor's Office," wrote Eastern MA Section Emergency Coordinator Rob Macedo, KD1CY. "I have also written an email to Natalie Jacobson."

ARRL Section Manager Mike Neilsen, W1MPN sent a section-wide email today to all Eastern MA ARRL members describing the incident along with actions he and his staff were taking to mitigate the situation.

"[Romney's] attitude about us sets an unfortunate tone within the state's executive branch," wrote Neilsen. "As a former military officer, I see this as a failure in leadership. My immediate concern is our working relationship within the [Massachusetts Emergency Management Team] environment." Neilsen intends to address the Governor's comments as "an urgent matter" at a meeting on November 17 with Don Carlton from the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency.

"I was very disturbed about what the Governor stated on the program," wrote Ron Wood, W1PLW, the section's Public Information Coordinator. "It does show that more work is needed by all hams in the section. It's a great idea to write letters explaining the good we do." Wood is attempting to schedule a meeting with the Governor's office tomorrow so that EMA ARRL staffers might discuss the matter further.

Tom Kinahan, N1CPE wrote that Governor Romney's comment has made "a PR problem" for Kinahan in his role as MA State RACES Officer.

"I've got a roster of over 150 Amateur Radio operators that support local communities, and those of us that directly support the state government. There are at least double that in terms of people that are actually out there that I don't have formal paperwork on that support Amateur Radio emergency communications in some organized manner... The Governor has said that he 'certainly doesn't need to rely on ham radio' -- where does that leave the RACES program now?"

"I am ashamed tonight that I am a Republican!" remarked one ham radio viewer. "[Romney] speaks in derogatory tones about hams. He certainly shows an ignorance as to what we do and are capable of. I suggest a grass roots campaign of local hams calling the State House and The Governor's Office to protest."

The television program can be viewed at http://www.thebostonchannel.com/video/5334306/detail.html.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amateurradio; ham; mi2008; radio; romney; romneytruthfile; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-245 next last
Mr. Romney clearly has misunderstood the role of Amateur Radio Operators around the United States during the many disaster responses that have been provided to states and Federal government over the last 100 years.

His failure to actually understand infrastructure related to "fixed services" is in my opinion, a telling sign of an individual who is clearly not qualified to stand in the position as Commander-in-Chief of the United States. His belief that "we don't need to deal with ham radio operators" is certainly ignorance on his part, when hundreds of thousands of hours of donated time, equipment and expertise have been give by men and women in the Amateur Radio Service.

The word "Amateur" is a misnomer. Rarely if ever is there an "amateur" among them, and they provide professional communications to everyone they serve, including the public.

The public perhaps in general might view a "Ham radio operator" as some sort of geeky person without a life. This can be no further from the truth. Most are professional men and women in all walks of life, professions and experience.

Mr. Romney dismisses their service as "nothing", after having spent millions on a fixed communications service and when questioned on things like interoperability he became more agitated, obviously not having answers to the questions.

The fact is all systems will fail, and there are usually single-point-of-failures in the systems, and this includes everything from the AC power supplied to your house, to the cellular telephone in your pocket. Satellite communication can fail in severe snow storms, and power systems and infrastructure can be destroyed by ice, snow and tornadic activity.

Over the years Amateurs have proven their worth over and over in disasters from California and Colorado wildfires, to Katrina. Where government supplied communications infrastructure has repeatedly failed, and no other communications was evident, Amateur Radio was there.

When ALL ELSE FAILS, Amateur radio is there.

Mr. Romney has shown his incompetence in this, what amounts to some, an insignificant issue. But to me, and other Amateurs throughout the country -- this is a serious and incomprehensible mistake on his part. He has never apologized to the Ham community where he was Governor, and he has never admitted this mistake publicly. Instead, this has been glossed over by many, and by some who support Romney it's "not an issue".

It WILL become an issue when he is C-in-C and we end up in a war where our country becomes the target. When the Hams are needed, they will still respond in SPITE of someone like this man. But, many will not vote for him.

Amateur Radio Operators deserve at LEAST an apology from this man, and until he does so, he won't be getting my vote.

(From the Federal Communications Commission) The Amateur Radio Service The amateur and amateur-satellite services are for qualified persons of any age who are interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest. These services present an opportunity for self-training, intercommunication, and technical investigations.

Millions of amateur operators in all areas of the world communicate with each other directly or through ad hoc relay systems and amateur-satellites. They exchange messages by voice, teleprinting, telegraphy, facsimile, and television. In areas where the FCC regulates the services, an amateur operator must have an FCC or Canadian license. FCC-issued Reciprocal Permit for Alien Amateur Licensee are no longer needed. Reciprocal operation in the U.S. is now authorized by Section 47 C.F.R. § 97.107.

All frequencies are shared. No frequency is assigned for the exclusive use of any amateur station. Station control operators cooperate in selecting transmitting channels to make the most effective use of the frequencies. They design, construct, modify, and repair their stations. The FCC equipment authorization program does not generally apply to amateur station transmitters.

1 posted on 01/10/2008 11:30:22 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

Romney is a big old ham.

He just doesn’t like the competition.


2 posted on 01/10/2008 11:32:15 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

I can’t believe JimRob didn’t include “attitude toward the ham radio community” in his “candidate deal-breaker” poll the other day.


3 posted on 01/10/2008 11:33:26 AM PST by xjcsa (Ethanol: burning poor people's food to save them from a bogus problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

Whether you like ham radio or not, not voting for someone based solely on that is rather immature.


4 posted on 01/10/2008 11:34:43 AM PST by technomage (Radical Islam gives me the urge to go to the bathroom and drop a big mohammed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

Lieberman doesn’t like ham either.


5 posted on 01/10/2008 11:35:31 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

There goes the Art Bell endorsement ...


6 posted on 01/10/2008 11:35:32 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

Romney the chameleon RINO cheater, who despises amateur radio operators. Why? Because they get the truth out?

Romney is a such ._.. / _ _ _ / ... / . / ._.


7 posted on 01/10/2008 11:37:30 AM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

LOL


8 posted on 01/10/2008 11:37:55 AM PST by Tribune7 (Dems want to rob from the poor to give to the rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

Maybe one of his neighbors has one of those 60-foot tall antennae sticking out of his roof causing an eyesore for the neighborhood. Not that I’ve ever seen anything like that in my town, of course.


9 posted on 01/10/2008 11:38:47 AM PST by hoppity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson
When ALL ELSE FAILS, Amateur radio is there.

As a self-organizing global communications net that needs no infrastructure, ham radio's whole value today is emergency communications. It should be 'sold' to the public specifically for this function. What better way would there be to bring young people back into the field?

10 posted on 01/10/2008 11:38:54 AM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage
Whether you like ham radio or not, not voting for someone based solely on that is rather immature.

It's no mare "immature" to vote or not vote for someone based on lying. This is similar to lying. It's called "ignorance". I don't want a President that is ignorant of failures in infrastructure which is what this is about. It's not the "apology" or Ham radio. It's the lack of understanding of RESOURCES. Sorry, you're wrong, this isn't "immature" (But, you and the other previous posters are certainly IMMATURE because not ONE of you had TIME to read the article, check it out, NOR read my comments before posting your own). So, don't preach to me, until you have educated yourselves.
11 posted on 01/10/2008 11:38:59 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: technomage
"Whether you like ham radio or not, not voting for someone based solely on that is rather immature."

His stand is relevant, because it exemplifies his preference for big govm't solutions.

12 posted on 01/10/2008 11:39:57 AM PST by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

Wow, Romney stepped in it this time. Ham operators are indespensible with regard to just about any national emergency. I guess the idea they don’t cost the state gazillions of dollars, probably reduces their importance to him.


13 posted on 01/10/2008 11:40:45 AM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

I understand the sentiment completely.

However, I do not think this thread is going to garner the reaction you might have wanted.


14 posted on 01/10/2008 11:41:47 AM PST by Petronski (Slick Willard LOVES government mandates. He said so himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson
The Governor replied in a disgusted tone, "No, we don't need to deal with ham radio operators..."

The only person Romney wants to deal with is himself. He has shown he is incapable of working with anybody especially other Republicains.
15 posted on 01/10/2008 11:42:25 AM PST by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I do not think this thread is going to garner the reaction you might have wanted.

Well you got that one right.

16 posted on 01/10/2008 11:42:46 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

Romney’s an elitist snob. What more needs to be said?


17 posted on 01/10/2008 11:43:07 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Seahawks should have went South for the winter - instead they're coming to Lambeau!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

Rommney’s a cable modem and satellite dish type of guy.


18 posted on 01/10/2008 11:44:10 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Loser.


19 posted on 01/10/2008 11:44:19 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: technomage

i think the evoked response adequately underscored your point. :-)


20 posted on 01/10/2008 11:46:11 AM PST by 1curiousmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson