Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA
Just can’t leave well enough alone. Why would he want to make Mit’s problem HIS problem?

He knows good and well that Romney's failure to rise in the polls, and his success in those same polls is because Mitt couldn't close the deal with the evangelicals. Rather than seeing Romney's past support of abortion as being the problem, he's concluded that it's the Mormon thing.

Now that he feels he's got the ball rolling, he's trying to put some additional spin on it for anybody who hasn't heard yet that Mitt's LDS, and if they don't know about it, what he thinks it means.

He's running for Preacher-in-Chief, and that's what none of us want. At least I'm dead sure that a sizable majority of Americans don't want that. Hillary is going to pull out every Baptist minister stereotype she can during the general election campaign if Huckster becomes our nominee.

81 posted on 12/11/2007 4:50:44 PM PST by hunter112 (Hillary Clinton - America’s Ex-Wife®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: hunter112

“He’s running for Preacher-in-Chief, and that’s what none of us want. At least I’m dead sure that a sizable majority of Americans don’t want that. Hillary is going to pull out every Baptist minister stereotype she can during the general election campaign if Huckster becomes our nominee.”

Yes and Bishop Mitt is running as the un-religious/totally religious Enigma.

Both Mitt and Huckleberry have inherent contradictions due to their religious backgrounds that will tear their campaigns apart and make their chance of winning the presidency near impossible. However, in a broken field, they could win the nomination.


165 posted on 12/11/2007 5:39:34 PM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson