Bad analogy to use when generalizing from something involving two people to an entity involving three hundred million. There were enough people of different faith traditions wandering about in this land over two hundred years ago for our Founding Fathers to specify that religious "tests" were not to be countenanced.
“There were enough people of different faith traditions wandering about in this land over two hundred years ago for our Founding Fathers to specify that religious “tests” were not to be countenanced.”
Do you and the people who spout that jibber -jabber actually believe that [religious “tests” were not to be countenanced.”] by free voters?
Now, what was said is that no religious test could prevent any man from running for office, but that is far away from saying a voter can not exercise pridence based on religious tests. Otherwise, it would be ILLEGAL NOT TO VOTE for Satanists!