To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
No, the whole point of the invented “macro-evolution” is that changes cannot accumulate far enough that the new popuation has lost its ability to interbreed with the ancestral one.
To: From many - one.
No, the whole point of the invented macro-evolution is that changes cannot accumulate far enough that the new popuation has lost its ability to interbreed with the ancestral one. Well, I hardly think macro-evolution is "invented", since we see evidence for it all around us, every day.
48 posted on
12/11/2007 9:44:58 AM PST by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(Conservatives - Freedom WITH responsibility; Libertarians - Freedom FROM responsibility)
To: From many - one.
"No, the whole point of the invented macro-evolution is that changes cannot accumulate far enough that the new popuation has lost its ability to interbreed with the ancestral one." Now are you making things up about what Creationists believe?
And again, macroevolution is a term recognized by many [Macro]evolutionists, though apparently you didn't get the memo....
98 posted on
12/11/2007 12:57:39 PM PST by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson