Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mommya
Arthur Koestler thought that an Asiatic Tribe called the Khazars converted to Judaism in the 10th century or so and that Ashkenazi Jews are descendant from them. He put forward the theory in the hopes that it would deflect accusations from Deicide from contemporary Jews who would have no connection to Roman era JEws. Today the theory is favored by Neo Nazis and Muslims as it also invalidates Jewish claims to the Holy Land.
23 posted on 12/11/2007 9:12:41 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

AS I understand it, DNA analysis has more or less disproved the Khazar theory.

While the Khazars did indeed “adopt Judaism,” it is likely that this applied primarily or only to the royal family and high aristocracy, not to the entire nation, which probably was dispersed anyway among the very fluid gene-mixing of the medieval steppe.


27 posted on 12/11/2007 9:20:22 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
Arthur Koestler thought that an Asiatic Tribe called the Khazars converted to Judaism in the 10th century or so and that Ashkenazi Jews are descendant from them. He put forward the theory in the hopes that it would deflect accusations from Deicide from contemporary Jews who would have no connection to Roman era JEws. Today the theory is favored by Neo Nazis and Muslims as it also invalidates Jewish claims to the Holy Land.

The Kagan of the Khazars, and the aristocracy, converted to Judaism, but it's unlikely that the bulk of the common people did.

32 posted on 12/11/2007 9:24:50 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Conservatives - Freedom WITH responsibility; Libertarians - Freedom FROM responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson