[P8riot]

I find it interesting that they don’t dispute the fact that there was a flood. But like every other secular “scientific” organization or publication they discount the possibility that it was caused by divine intervention in mankind’s history. The y thus break with science in that they do not explore every possible cause.

[ari-freedom]

no, what they are doing is useful. This is just one piece of the puzzle.

[Kozak]

But like every other secular “scientific” organization or publication they discount the possibility that it was caused by divine intervention in mankind’s history.

Uh thats because science requires a logical, verifiable answer. Saying " and then a miracle happened" is by definition NOT science, it's religion.