Golly gee, Cottshop, it sounds like you’ve snapped. All we’ve ever requested was evidence of design from ID proponets. Huffing and puffing isn’t going to blow anything down. All you have provided was a diatribe complaining that science doesn’t accept the ‘it’s complex ergo it’s designed’ premise.
And for posting the evidence of what you describe as macroevolution, which is a creationist-coined term because they have had no choice but to accept microevolution, another creationist term, but no different than macro evolution, the FR server could not handle the dataoverload of having hundreds of thousands of papers put here, plus the associated copyright infringement implications. GO to any university library and they will have reams of published work. It’s so easy to look up, even a caveman could do it.
Providing you taught him one of the most commonly used modern languages, of course. :-D
[[And for posting the evidence of what you describe as macroevolution, which is a creationist-coined term because they have had no choice but to accept microevolution,]]
Lol- again- if that’s the best you got- then quite frankly you got nothing- Creationists were the first ones to discover and record and test Microevolution- Study up Doc- you’re slipping