Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doc30

I would appreciate if you would give me the testimony or furnish a link. Sorry, But any “ definition” of science is problematical. Narrow it enough and one excludes a “soft” science like psychology/psychiatry. Open it up and one includes something like sociology-as Marx understood the term.


165 posted on 12/03/2007 11:41:26 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS

Try Googling the text in #23 and #70 and you’ll turn up the transcript of the trial.

In order to include ID in the realm of science, Behe had to redefine “science” such that astrology was included.


167 posted on 12/03/2007 1:16:59 PM PST by ahayes ("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson