Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chode

Actually, one can probably argue that the legal “discouragement” of setting booby-traps is a common law tradition with a lineage of at least a couple hundred years.


18 posted on 10/13/2007 7:06:33 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
Image hosted by Photobucket.comtrue, but there were RATS even back then... as far as i can see it's merely a law to protect criminals and prosecute the victim.
24 posted on 10/13/2007 7:31:06 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy
Actually, one can probably argue that the legal “discouragement” of setting booby-traps is a common law tradition with a lineage of at least a couple hundred years.

Activist judges don't care about the law, common or otherwise. They are more inclined to base their rulings on what feels good to them at the time.

25 posted on 10/13/2007 7:36:29 AM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson