To: monomaniac
A third party would elect Clinton. We all know where she stands on the issue...
2 posted on
10/07/2007 9:00:51 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(When it makes you mad -- "ping & grrrr" -- Freeper:pandoraou812)
To: monomaniac
Obviously somebody running for a party’s nomination does not support a third party. Teddy Roosevelt did not support a third party until after the GOP convention.
4 posted on
10/07/2007 9:06:38 PM PDT by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(IF TREASON IS THE QUESTION, THEN MOVEON.ORG IS THE ANSWER!)
To: monomaniac
"No, I think a third party only helps elect Hillary [Clinton]," Huckabee said of the pro-abortion New York senator.Obviously Huckabee is part of the vast pro Giuliani cross dressing conspiracy, /s
5 posted on
10/07/2007 9:08:07 PM PDT by
Maynerd
(Hilary = amnesty and socialized medicine)
To: monomaniac
Note to Paul bashers: Ron Paul is not running as a 3rd party or independent candidate.
To: monomaniac
Guess they will have to just be content with hoping that one of them get the VP nod.
7 posted on
10/07/2007 10:02:34 PM PDT by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: monomaniac
If the GOP nominates one of these RINOs, it will have made itself a “third party” by default.
11 posted on
10/08/2007 6:05:57 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Romney is Giuliani. He's just lying about it.)
To: monomaniac
Folks like Brownback and Huckabee who foreclose the option of a so-called third party are trying to give away the whole game on behalf of conservatives.
But, sorry, they don’t speak for me.
I will no more support a Giuliani or a Romney than I will support Hillary Clinton. And I could care less what letter is next to their name.
And I won’t support anyone who says they will. They’ve self-selected out of any possible consideration.
12 posted on
10/08/2007 6:16:34 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Romney is Giuliani. He's just lying about it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson