Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csvset
A state lawmaker who opposed a bill giving Texans stronger right to defend themselves with deadly force pulled a gun and shot a man he says was trying to steal copper wiring from a construction site, police said Monday.

Since this was a construction site, does this truly qualify under the "castle doctrine?"

16 posted on 07/09/2007 5:46:20 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Withhold Taxes - Starve a Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cowboy Bob

He was on his own property and he had a concealed carry liscense he doest need the castle law under either of those circumstances.

The castle law in TX essentially says that your “Car” is an extention of your home and you have the right to carry in you car and defend yourself from your car


20 posted on 07/09/2007 5:52:02 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Cowboy Bob
Since this was a construction site, does this truly qualify under the "castle doctrine?"

Yep, although it doesn't really matter, it was his property, he was on it, and defended it (and himself). The new Castle doctrine doesn't change that. Even his possession of a CHL is irrelevant when on your own property or property you control.

43 posted on 07/09/2007 8:41:22 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson