Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KuernoDeChivo
The only reason Paul should be banned is because he is a third level candidate. He has zero chance of winning the party’s choice for president. He should run as a third party or as a dumbascrap.
3 posted on 05/17/2007 9:43:38 AM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I'm so anti-pc, I use a Mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Andy from Beaverton

I agree that a candidate should have to show a minimum 10% level in at least 3 public opinion polls to qualify for the debates. It’s a waste of time for the Kucinich/Paul wings to be on the stage.


4 posted on 05/17/2007 9:45:58 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Andy from Beaverton
The only reason Paul should be banned is because he is a third level candidate. He has zero chance of winning the party’s choice for president. He should run as a third party or as a dumbascrap.

I'm not Ron Paul supporter, Mike Huckabee is my guy, being totally against Ron Paul's isolationist stance. But, Ron Paul should not be banned by the GOP, but part of the debate. Healthy debate includes many voices from many perspectives. Banning Ron Paul because some don't like some a couple of the issues he raises, is not what conservatism is about. Purging is what leftists do.

7 posted on 05/17/2007 9:49:57 AM PDT by Risky-Riskerdo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson