To: KuernoDeChivo
The only reason Paul should be banned is because he is a third level candidate. He has zero chance of winning the party’s choice for president. He should run as a third party or as a dumbascrap.
To: Andy from Beaverton
I agree that a candidate should have to show a minimum 10% level in at least 3 public opinion polls to qualify for the debates. It’s a waste of time for the Kucinich/Paul wings to be on the stage.
4 posted on
05/17/2007 9:45:58 AM PDT by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: Andy from Beaverton
The only reason Paul should be banned is because he is a third level candidate. He has zero chance of winning the partys choice for president. He should run as a third party or as a dumbascrap.
I'm not Ron Paul supporter, Mike Huckabee is my guy, being totally against Ron Paul's isolationist stance. But, Ron Paul should not be banned by the GOP, but part of the debate. Healthy debate includes many voices from many perspectives. Banning Ron Paul because some don't like some a couple of the issues he raises, is not what conservatism is about. Purging is what leftists do.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson